<!--
page=new Array()

//
//    JavaScript Search Engine.
//    See www.javascript.freeuk.com for details.
//
//    Enter your page indexes here.
//    Each page must be on one line only and be numbered consecutively starting from 1.
//
page[1]=["contact_us.html","Contact Us","Office Locations","Tampa, St. Petersburg, New Port Richey, Florida Keys."]
page[2]=["firm_profile.html","Firm Profile","About Us","One of the most diversified, available, and convenient regional civil litigation firms in Florida."]
page[3]=["","","",""]
page[4]=["","","",""]
page[5]=["atty-clark.html"," William Lee Clark "," Attorney Profile "," Practice Areas: Appeals, Personal Injury Protection and General Litigation "]
page[6]=["atty-kors.html","Terry L. Kors, Jr."," Attorney Profile ","Practice Areas: Insurance Defense; Property and Casualty Claims; Construction Law."]
page[7]=["atty-mcmullen.html"," Sheldon D. McMullen "," Attorney Profile "," Practice Areas: Personal Injury; Insurance Policy Claims; Maritime Contractual Disputes; Commercial Contractual Disputes; Construction Industry; General Commercial Litigation; Satellite Policy; Theft of Trade Secrets; Foreclosure; Contracts; "]
page[8]=["atty-diFiore.html","Dorothy Venable DiFiore","Attorney Profile","Practice Areas: Appeals; Civil Litigation; Personal Injury; Insurance Coverage; Premises Liability; Nursing Home Litigation Medical Malpractice; Bad Faith Litigation."]
page[9]=["atty-evans.html","  Matthew L. Evans  ","  Attorney Profile  ","  Practice Areas: Bad Faith Defense; General Casualty; Civil Liability; Commercial Liability; Contracts; Construction Defect  "]
page[10]=["atty-.html","","",""]
page[11]=["atty-haas.html","Raymond A. Haas","Attorney Profile","Practice Areas: Civil litigation with emphasis on the defense of Bad Faith; Class Action; Commercial and Personal Lines Insurance Coverage Issues; Workers Compensation; First and Third Party Contract Liability; Property Loss Claims."]
page[12]=["atty-.html","","",""]
page[13]=["atty-lewis.html","Andrew J. Lewis","Attorney Profile","Practice Areas: Insurance defense; Insurance Coverage; Commercial and Civil Litigation; Liability Claims, Toxic Torts, Property and Casualty Claims, Auto Claims; Bad Faith. Mediation: Mr. Lewis is also a Florida Supreme Court Certified Circuit and County court Mediator."]
page[14]=["atty-stein.html","Michael B. Stein","Attorney Profile","Practice Areas: Insurance Defense; First Party Property Coverage Claims; Fraud; Bad Faith Litigation; Auto Negligence; Premises Liability."]
page[15]=["pa-appeals.html","Practice Area: Appeals","Appeals","Our appellate group handles appeals generated from trials undertaken by firm lawyers, as well as appeals referred to the firm from other attorneys and clients. These professionals are readily available to advise and assist in the preparation of legal issues for trial and also in protecting the record for appellate purposes. The firm’s appellate attorneys also keep clients up-to-date on relevant court opinions, share their knowledge and experience by advising on questions of coverage and current law, and regularly provide clients a newsletter that summarizes current legal decisions of interest to them. Additionally, periodic updates on legislation and significant court decisions that may have widespread ramifications are provided by special memoranda to clients"]
page[16]=["pa-construction.html","Practice Area: Construction & Commercial Litigation","Commerical Litigation","The firm represents both plaintiffs and defendants in general commercial litigation, with a particular emphasis on construction matters, including construction defect and mechanics' lien claims. The firm's attorneys have handled a wide variety of commercial litigation matters, such as contract disputes and landlord/tenant and lender/debtor disputes."]
page[17]=["pa-fraud.html","Practice Area: Fraud & SIU","Fraud & Special Investigation Units","Every year the cost of insurance fraud is passed on to the consumer at a staggering rate. Some industry estimates place the annual amount as high as 80 billion dollars. Unscrupulous individuals have no qualms as to the effect their illicit activities have on your insurance premiums. Our attorneys and staff are aggressive in identifying auto insurance fraud as well as medical provider fraud by careful analysis of suspicious losses and claims. Our fraud team has considerable experience in providing solid legal support to Special Investigations Units throughout the state in rooting out fraudulent and exaggerated billing practices."]
page[18]=["pa-general_casualty.html","Practice Area: General Casualty","General Casualty & Products Liability","Numerous catastrophic injury cases involving structural failure, product defect, and other types of claims, have been handled by the various attorneys of the firm. Experienced attorneys within the firm handle a wide variety of personal injury and wrongful death actions, based on negligence, strict liability, contract, and intentional tort theories. The firm also handles more common personal injury claims, such as auto accident and premises liability matters. The key elements to our approach are client direction and involvement, systematic reporting, and the aggressive pursuit of the resolution of the claim with awareness of economic considerations. Special attention is given to efficiency so that services may be rendered in the most advantageous and yet economic fashion."]
page[19]=["pa-mediation.html","Practice Area: Mediation","Mediation","Our firm provides quality mediation services in the following areas: Commercial; Contract Dispute; Libel & Slander; Negligence; Nursing Homes; Personal Injury; Product Liability; Real Estate; Small Claims; Torts; Wrongful Death; Please call our office at 1-800-876-3392 to determine if mediation is an appropriate option in your specific legal case."] 
page[20]=["pa-nursing_homes.html","Practice Area: Nursing Homes","Medical Negligence","The representation of medical and nursing home professionals, interpreting their applicable insurance coverage and determining their legal duties and liabilities has long been a focus of the firm's Medical Negligence group. Firm attorneys that focus on this practice area appreciate the special needs of the elderly and are adept at representing patients as well as the people and institutions charged with their care, including both profit and non-profit organizations."]
page[21]=["pa-property.html","Practice Area: Property","Property & Insurance Coverage Disputes","With the firm's involvement in the American Bar Association, The Florida Advisory Committee on Arson Prevention, and other organizations dedicated to expertise in property insurance and bond disputes, property damage litigators handle the demands of daily file handling, while responding to more complex matters. The firm also handles major subrogation suits to recover monies clients have paid. Members of the property group regularly participate in state and national education seminars on issues of insurance coverage as they relate to property damage. Our clients benefit because our lawyers stay on the cutting edge of property insurance law."]
page[22]=["pa-wills.html","Practice Area: Wills","Wills & Estate Administration","Designating how your property will be distributed at death is a sensitive undertaking.  Our thoughtful approach to estate planning and administration reflects this sensitivity, advising you and providing direction through the process of selecting the appropriate estate planning methods.   We can provide you with the right tools to meet your goals. These tools include: Wills; Living Wills; Estate Administration; Healthcare Surrogacy; Durable Powers of; Attorney; Guardianship Legal Advice and Representation.  We also understand the complications and emotional sensitivity associated with the probate process and administration of the estate. Through a thoughtful and timely approach, we provide families with guidance and representation before probate courts, representation when a guardianship is necessary, and assistance in the administration of estates."]
page[23]=["pa-workerscomp.html","Practice Area:  Workers' Compensation","Workers Compensation","The Attorneys of Haas Lewis DiFiore, P.A. maintain an active practice in the defense of workers' compensation cases. The combined experience of the organization's workers' compensation attorneys, both before the state's judges of compensation claims and on appeal, and in mediation, has given the firm its reputation for the highest level of professionalism, capability, and effectiveness."]
page[24]=["events.html","  Seminars  -  Seminar  ","Events","Anaylyzing The Time-Demand And Bad Faith Scenarios -  DiFiore  -  Continuing Education Seminar  "]
page[25]=["clu-012010.html","  Fourth DCA Rules That Failure To Designate Rules By Which Arbitration <br /> Would Be Conducted Did Not Invalidate Arbitration Agreement  ","  Premier Real Estate Holdings, LLC v. Butch  ","  Chapter 682  "]
page[26]=["continuing_education.html","Continuing Education","In House Seminar","The firm has been approved by the Florida Department of Financial Services as a continuing education provider. Our attorneys are prepared to conduct in house seminars on our premises or at a location convenient to you on the following topics: Auto Coverage; Bad Faith; Case Law Updates; Combating Attorney’s Fees; Handling the Pre-suit Time Demand;  Sinkhole and Mold Litigation -  If you are interested in any of the above or related topics and would like to arrange for an in house seminar or if you have any questions regarding our programs, please contact us at 1-800-876-3392."]
page[27]=["terms_of_use.html","Terms","Web Site","Contact with this Web site does not constitute an attorney-client relationship and the material contained in this Web site does not constitute legal advice. The information provided is for educational and/or informational purposes only."]
page[28]=["clu-010410.html","   Inadvertently Disclosed Attorney-Client Privileged Material  ","  Nova Southeastern University, Inc. v. Jacobson  ","  Florida Rule of Professional Conduct 4-4.4  "]
page[29]=["clu-010410a.html","  Unilateral Offer To Settle  ","  Gonzalez   v.   Claywell  ","  Defendant Deviated From Specific Terms  "]
page[30]=["clu-010510.html","  Personal Jurisdiction Over Out Of State Resident  ","  Email  ","  Price v. John F. Kronenberger  -  48.193 "]
page[31]=["clu-011410.html","  Exculpatory Clause  ","  Release Form  ","  Tatman v. Space Coast Kennel Club  "]
page[32]=["clu-011510.html","  Manner Of Stolen Vehicle Not Legally Foreseeable Thereby Precluding Liability  ","  Demelus v. King Motor Co.  ","  foreseeable risk  "]
page[33]=["clu-011810.html"," Fifth DCA Finds Citizens Property Insurance Corporation Immune From Bad Faith Claims "," Citizens Property Ins. Co. v. Garfinkel "," 627.351  -  624.155 "]
page[34]=["clu-011910.html","  Non-Party Is Not Obligated To File Privilege Log To Preserve Privileges In Documents Sought By Subpoena  ","  Westco, Inc. v. Scott Lewis' Gardening &amp; Trimming, Inc.  ","  in camera inspection  "]
page[35]=["clu-012110.html","  Fifth DCA Denies Taxation Of Overhead Expenses To Opposing Party  ","  The Landmark Winter Park, LLC v. Colman  "," award of fees and costs   "]
page[36]=["clu-012510.html","  Fourth DCA Quashes Circuit Court Order Compelling Production Of IME Video And Transcript To Defendant  ","  Florida Rule of Civli Procedure Rule 1.360  ","  Maguire v. Pool Doctor of the Palm Beaches, Inc.  "]
page[37]=["clu-012710.html","  Broward Circuit Court Finds Provider Does Not Have Standing To<br />Recover Statutory Fines For Insurer's Alleged Violations Of Various PIP Provisions  ","  United Auto. Ins. Co. v. County Line Chiropractic Center  ","  627.736  -  626.9521  "]
page[38]=["clu-020810.html","  Florida Supreme Court Finds That Pre-Suit Notice Requirement Was<br />Substantive Amendment To PIP Statute And Could Not Be Applied<br />Retroactively Despite Legislative Intent  "," Menendez v. Progressive Express Insurance Co., Inc. "," 627.736 "]
page[39]=["clu-020910.html","  Dade Circuit Court Rules No Expert Witness Fee For Treating Provider And<br />Rejects Lack Of Cooperation/Late Notice Defense Due To Lack Of<br />Prejudice To Insurer; "," Awards Fees To Provider For Prevailing On Substantive Issues "," United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Dade Injury Rehab Center, Inc. (a/a/o Denis Diaz-Matamoro) -  627.736  "]
page[40]=["clu-021110.html","  Palm Beach Circuit Court Finds That Small Claims Rule Allow For Motions For<br /> Reconsideration File Within 10 Days Of final Judgment  ","  Correspondence By Email Does Not constitute Filing  ","  Kranitz v. Zion  -  Small Claims Rule 7.020  -  Small Claims Rule 7.180  -  Civil Rule 1.090  -  Rule 7.080(d)  "]
page[41]=["clu-021510.html","  Federal Court Determined That Late Notice To Policy Coverage Was A Question Of Fact For The Jury  ","  Vision I v. Aspen Specialty Insurance Company & James River Insurance Company  ","  summary judgment  "]
page[42]=["clu-022210.html","  First DCA Finds That Rule 1.090 Time Deadlines Do Not Apply To<br /> Premium Payment Deadlines Established Pursuant To Contract  ","  Nationwide  Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Smith  "," non-payment of premium -  deadline  "]
page[43]=["clu-061710.html","  En Banc Panel Of Fifth DCA Withdraws Earlier Determination That<br />Medical Provider-Assignees Are Required To Submit To EUO - <br />Concludes That Such Duties Under The Contract Are Not Included In<br />the Assignment Of Contract Rights  ","Shaw, et. al. v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co., et. al.  ","  627.736  -  Examination Under Oath  "]
page[44]=["clu-022510a.html"," First DCA Finds That Admission Of Evidence Of Absence Of Prior Similar Accidents, i.e. <br />Nonoccurrence Evidence, Without A Positive Determination Of<br />Substantially Similar Condition Is A Reversible Error  ","  Hogan v. Gray Gable and Nassau Village Volunteer Fire Dept., Inc.  ","  Jackson v. H.L. Bouton Co.  "]
page[45]=["clu-030210.html","  Miami-Dade County Court Refuses To Follow Third DCA Majority Opinion, Relies On Dissent To<br /> Find That Medical Provider Is Not Obligated To Attend EUO  ","  Flagler Clinic Center, Corp., (a/a/o Ramon Gomez) v. State Farm Mutl Auto. Ins. Co.  "," Shaw "]
page[46]=["clu-030210a.html","  County Court Finds Insurer Waived Defense Based On Failure To Attend EUO<br />By Failing To Notify Insured Or Medical Provider Of This Defense Prior To Suit<br />And That Patient, As Omnibus Insured Was Not Obligated<br />To Attend EUO Under the Policy","  South Fla. Pain & Rehab, P.A., (a/a/o Kirt Godfrey) v. United Auto. Ins. Co.  ","  Examination Under Oath -  PIP  "]
page[47]=["clu-030210b.html","Trial Court Abused Its Discretion In Allowing Expert Witness To<br />Render An Opinion That Applies A Legal Standard  ","  Estate of Caulie Jackson Murray v. Delta Health Group, Inc. and Antone   ","  Dr. Desai  -  Desai  "]
page[48]=["clu-042610.html","  Third DCA Rules That Fraud Related To Claim For Lost Wages Voided All Coverage, <br />Including Claim For Medical Expenses And Affirmed Summary Judgment <br />Where Evidence Of Fraud Was Clear In The Record  ","  Bosem v. Commerce &amp; Industry Ins. Co.,  ","  Good Faith  -  Bad Faith  -  627.736  "]
page[49]=["clu-070109.html","Second DCA Reverses Directed Verdict","Hirst v. Segrest Farms, Inc.","Bicyclist Was Run Over When He Rode Into The Side Of A Moving Box Truck -  Bicycle "]
page[50]=["Rule_1.830.html","Mediation Arbitration - Rules of Civil Procedure","RULE 1.830","Voluntary Binding Arbitration"]
page[51]=["768.041.html","Release or covenant not to sue","768.041","Negligence"]
page[52]=["768.0415.html","Liability for injury to parent","768.0415","Negligence"]
page[53]=["768.042.html","Damages","768.042","Damage"]
page[54]=["768.0425.html","Damages actions against contractors for negligence","malfeasance - misfeasance","768.0425"]
page[55]=["768.043.html","Remittitur and additur","actions arising out of operation of motor vehicles","768.043"]
page[56]=["768.07.html","Railroad","liability for injury to employees","768.07"]
page[57]=["768.0705.html","Limitation on premises liability","Negligence","768.0705"]
page[58]=["768.0710.html","Burden of proof in claims of negligence","Negligence","768.0710"]
page[59]=["768.075.html","Immunity from liability for injury to trespassers on real property","trespass, trespassing","768.075"]
page[60]=["768.08.html","Liability of corporations having relief department for injury to employees","corporation","768.08"]
page[61]=["768.091.html","Employer liability limits","ridesharing","768.091"]
page[62]=["768.10.html","Pits and holes","not to be left open, negligence","768.10"]
page[63]=["768.11.html","Pits and holes","measure of damages, measure of damage","768.11"]
page[64]=["768.125.html","Liability for injury or damage resulting from intoxication","Negligence","768.125"]
page[65]=["768.128.html","Section I - General","Negligence","768.128 Hazardous spills"]
page[66]=["768.13.html","Good Samaritan Act","Immunity from civil liability","768.13"]
page[67]=["768.135.html","Volunteer team physicians","Immunity, Physician","768.135"]
page[68]=["768.136.html","Liability for canned or perishable food distributed free of charge","Negligence","768.136"]
page[69]=["768.16.html","Wrongful Death Act","Negligence","768.16"]
page[70]=["768.17.html","Legislative intent","Negligence","768.17"]
page[71]=["768.18.html","Definitions","Negligence","768.18"]
page[72]=["768.19.html","Right of action","Negligence","768.19"]
page[73]=["768.20.html","Parties","Negligence","768.20"]
page[74]=["768.21.html","Damages","Negligence","768.21"]
page[75]=["768.22.html","Form of verdict","Negligence","768.22"]
page[76]=["768.23.html","Protection of minors and incompetents","Minor, Incompetent, Negligence","768.23"]
page[77]=["768.24.html","Death of a survivor before judgment","Negligence","768.24"]
page[78]=["768.25.html","Court approval of settlements","Negligence","768.25"]
page[79]=["768.26.html","Litigation expenses","Negligence","768.26"]
page[80]=["768.14.html","Suit by state","Waiver of sovereign immunity, Negligence","768.14"]
page[81]=["768.28.html","Waiver of sovereign immunity in tort actions","Indemnification, Indemnify, Risk management programs","768.28"]
page[82]=["768.31.html","Contribution among tortfeasors"," Tortfeasor, Negligence","768.31"]
page[83]=["768.36.html","Alcohol or drug defense","Negligence","768.36"]
page[84]=["768.71.html","Applicability - Conflicts","Conflict, Damages","768.71 "]
page[85]=["768.72.html","Pleading in civil actions","Claim for punitive damages","768.72"]
page[86]=["768.725.html","Punitive damages","Burden of proof","768.725"]
page[87]=["768.73.html","Punitive damages","Limitation","768.73"]
page[88]=["768.735.html","Punitive damages","Exceptions","768.735"]
page[89]=["768.736.html","Punitive damages","Exceptions for intoxication, Intoxicated","768.736"]
page[90]=["768.737.html","Punitive damages","Application in arbitration","768.737"]
page[91]=["768.74.html","Remittitur and additur","Damages","768.74"]
page[92]=["768.75.html","Optional settlement conference in certain tort actions","Damages, Torts","768.75"]
page[93]=["768.76.html","Collateral Sources of Indemnity","Indemnify","768.76"]
page[94]=["768.77.html","Collateral Sources of Indemnity","Itemized verdict, Indemnify","768.77 "]
page[95]=["768.78.html","Collateral Sources of Indemnity","Alternative methods of payment of damage awards, Indemnify","768.78 "]
page[96]=["768.81.html","Collateral Sources of Indemnity","Comparative fault, Indemnify","768.81"]
page[97]=["627.4136.html","Nonjoinder of Insurers","Insurer","627.4136"]
page[98]=["Rule_1.442.html","Offers of Settlement","Proposals for Settlement, Proposal, Offer","Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442"]
page[99]=["45.061.html","Offers of Settlement","Offer","45.061"]
page[100]=["768.79.html","Offers of Settlement","Offer of judgment and demand for judgment","768.79"]
page[101]=["627.4132.html","Anti-Stacking Statute","Stacking of coverages prohibited","627.4132"]
page[102]=["324.021.html","Definitions - Minimum insurance required","Financial Responsibilityâ€”Definitions & Required Provisions","324.021"]
page[103]=["324.031.html","Manner of proving financial responsibility","Financial Responsibilityâ€”Definitions & Required Provisions","324.031"]
page[104]=["324.151.html","Motor vehicle liability policies","Financial Responsibilityâ€”Definitions & Required Provisions","324.151"]
page[105]=["627.730.html","Florida Motor Vehicle No Fault Law","Pip/No-Fault Law","627.730"]
page[106]=["627.731.html","Pip/No-Fault Law","Purpose","627.731"]
page[107]=["627.732.html","PIP - No Fault","Definitions","627.732"]
page[108]=["627.733.html","Required security","Pip/No-Fault Law","627.733 "]
page[109]=["627.734.html","Proof of security","Pip/No-Fault Law - Security requirements - Penalties","627.734"]
page[110]=["627.736.html","Required personal injury protection benefits","Pip/No-Fault Law - Exclusions","627.736"]
page[111]=["627.737.html","Tort exemption - Limitation on right to damages","Pip/No-Fault Law - Punitive damages","627.737"]
page[112]=["627.739.html","Optional limitations","Pip/No-Fault Law - Deductibles","627.739"]
page[113]=["627.7401.html","Notification of insured's rights","Pip/No-Fault Law","627.7401 "]
page[114]=["627.7405.html","Insurers' right of reimbursement","Pip/No-Fault Law","627.7405 "]
page[115]=["627.7415.html","Additional liability insurance coverage - Additional coverage","Pip/No-Fault Law - Commercial motor vehicles","627.7415"]
page[116]=["627.7263.html","Rental and leasing driver's insurance to be primary","Rental Car Insurance","627.7263"]
page[117]=["627.727.html","Motor vehicle insurance - uninsured and underinsured vehicle coverage","Uninsured and Underinsured Vehicle Coverage - insolvent insurer protection","627.727"]
page[118]=["627.7277.html","Notice of renewal premium","Uninsured and Underinsured Vehicle Coverage","627.7277"]
page[119]=["627.7295.html","Motor vehicle insurance contracts","Insurance Contracts","627.7295"]
page[120]=["627.72951.html","Temporary binding permitted","Insurance Contracts","627.72951"]
page[121]=["768.12.html","Motor vehicle colliding with any animal at large on a public highway","Collision with Animals","768.12"]
page[122]=["627.701.html","Liability of insureds","Coinsurance - Deductibles","627.701"]
page[123]=["627.7011.html","Homeowners policies","Offer of replacement cost coverage and law and ordinance coverage","627.7011"]
page[124]=["627.7015.html","Alternative procedure for resolution of disputed property insurance claims","Disputed property insurance claims","627.7015"]
page[125]=["627.7016.html","Contracts","Insurer Contracts with Building Contractors","627.7016"]
page[126]=["627.7017.html","Storm Damage","Hurricane Loss Mitigation Projects"," 627.7017 - hurricanes "]
page[127]=["627.702.html","Valued Policy Law","Valued Policy Law","627.702"]
page[128]=["627.705.html","Return of unearned premium on overinsured personal property","insurance premiums","627.705"]
page[129]=["627.706.html","  Sinkhole insurance  ","627.706","  Sinkhole  "]
page[130]=["627.7061.html","  Coverage Inquiries  ","  Coverage Inquiry - 627.7061  ","  Sinkhole  "]
page[131]=["627.7065.html","  Sinkhole Database  ","  627.7065 Database of information relating to sinkholes  ","  Sinkholes "]
page[132]=["627.707.html","  Standards for investigation of sinkhole claims  ","  Standard for investigation of sinkhole claims by insurers - 627.707 - Nonrenewals ","  Sinkholes  "]
page[133]=["627.7072.html","  Testing Standards for Sinkholes  ","  Testing Standard for Sinkholes - 627.7072  ","  Sinkholes  "]
page[134]=["627.7073.html","  Sinkhole Reports  ","  Sink Hole Reports  ","  627.7073  "]
page[135]=["627.7077.html","  Affordability and availability of sinkhole insurance  ","  Feasibility study - 627.7077  ","  Sinkholes  "]
page[136]=["627.711.html","  Premium discounts for hurricane loss mitigation  ","  Notice of premium discounts for hurricane loss mitigation  ","  627.711  "]
page[137]=["631.50.html","FIGA","Title","631.50 "]
page[138]=["631.51.html","FIGA","Purposes","631.51"]
page[139]=["631.52.html","FIGA","Scope","631.52"]
page[140]=["631.53.html","FIGA","Construction","631.53"]
page[141]=["631.54.html","FIGA","Definitions","631.54"]
page[142]=["631.55.html","FIGA","Creation of the Association","631.55"]
page[143]=["631.56.html","FIGA","Board of Directors","631.56"]
page[144]=["631.57.html","FIGA","Powers and Duties of the Association","631.57"]
page[145]=["631.58.html","FIGA","Plan of Operation","631.58"]
page[146]=["631.59.html","FIGA","Duties and Powers of Department and Office","631.59"]
page[147]=["631.60.html","FIGA","Effect of Paid Claims","631.60"]
page[148]=["631.61.html","FIGA","Nonduplication of Recovery","631.61"]
page[149]=["631.62.html","FIGA","Prevention of Insolvencies","631.62"]
page[150]=["631.63.html","FIGA","Examination of the Association","631.63"]
page[151]=["631.64.html","FIGA","Recognition of Assessments in Rates","631.64"]
page[152]=["631.65.html","FIGA","Prohibited Advertisement or Solicitation","631.65"]
page[153]=["631.66.html","FIGA","FIGA - Immunity","631.66"]
page[154]=["631.67.html","FIGA","Stay of Proceedings - Reopening of Default Judgments","631.67"]
page[155]=["631.68.html","FIGA","Limitation - Certain Actions","631.68"]
page[156]=["631.695.html","FIGA","Revenue Bond Issuance through Counties or Municipalities","631.695"]
page[157]=["631.70.html","FIGA","Attorney's Fee","Attorney Fee, Attorneys' Fee, Attorneys' Fees, Attorney Fees","631.70"]
page[158]=["lm-citizens.html","Citizens Property Insurance Corporation","Insurance Risk Apportionment Plans","627.351"]
page[159]=["privacy.html","Privacy","Privacy Policy","  web site  -  e-mail - website - email "]
page[160]=["employment.html","Employment Opportunities","Jobs"," Affiliate; Associate; Paralegal; Legal Secretary  "]
page[161]=["627.428.html","Attorney's fee"," omnibus insured  -  named beneficiary under a policy or contract executed by the insurer  ","Attorney's fee; Attorneys fee; Attorney's fees; Attorneys fees; 627.428"]
page[162]=["clu-111009.html","  Enforceable  Settlement  Agreement  , "," Hanson  v.  Maxfield ","  627.4137  "]
page[163]=["624.155.html","  Civil Remedy  ","  Bad Faith  -  Good Faith  ","  624.155  "]
page[164]=["626.9541.html","Unfair or Deceptive Practices; Unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices"," false or misleading statements; Unfair or Deceptive Practices","Unfair discrimination  ;  material misrepresentation  ; Denying claims - reasonable investigation  -  626.9541  "]
page[165]=["627.426.html", "Claims Administration","Acknowledgment of the receipt of notice of loss or claim under the policy; nonwaiver agreement;<br />  terms of agreement  ","  627.426  "]
page[166]=["627.4265.html","Payment of settlement","Settlement of a claim","In any case in which a person and an insurer have agreed in writing to the settlement of a claim, the insurer shall tender payment according to the terms of the agreement no later than 20 days after such settlement is reached; 627.4265"]
page[167]=["627.427.html","Payment of judgment by insurer","  penalty for failure ","  recovery of money  -  627.427  "]
page[168]=["clu-110409.html"," State Farm Florida Insurance Company v. Seville Place Condominium Association "," Bad Faith "," Appraisal , Seville "]
page[169]=["624.128.html","Crime Victim Exemption","  deductible  -  copayment  -  copay  -  insurance policy  -  Florida Crimes Compensation Act  -  co-payment  -  co-pay  ","  624.128  "]
page[170]=["627.4137.html","Disclosure of Certain Information Required","Former Florida Statute 627.7264","627.4137"]
page[171]=["68.081.html","Florida False Claims Act","Purpose:  To deter persons from knowingly causing or assisting in causing state government to pay claims that are false or fraudulent","68.081"]
page[172]=["68.082.html","False Claims Against the State","Definitions; Liability; ","68.082"]
page[173]=["68.083.html","Civil Actions for False Claims ","  Department of Financial Services  -  civil action  -  Department of Legal Affairs  ","  68.083  "]
page[174]=["68.084.html","Rights of the Parties in Civil Actions ","  civil remedy  ","  68.084  "]
page[175]=["68.085.html","Awards to Plaintiffs Bringing Action ","Plaintiff","68.085"]
page[176]=["68.086.html","Attorney's Fees and Costs","Attorneys Fee; Expenses; Attorneys Fees","68.086"]
page[177]=["68.087.html","Exemptions to Civil Actions ","Exemption;   Legislature  -  member of the judiciary  - senior executive branch official   ","  68.087  "]
page[178]=["68.088.html"," Protection for Participating Employees","Employee","68.088"]
page[179]=["68.089.html","Limitation of Actions","Limitation; Action","68.089"]
page[180]=["68.09.html","Burden of Proof","  qui tam plaintiff  -  cause of action  -  damages  ","  68.09  "]
page[181]=["68.091.html","Construction and Severability of Provisions","  Severable  ","  68.091  "]
page[182]=["627.745.html","Mediation of Claims","Mediator; Mediators","627.745"]
page[183]=["44.102.html","Court-Ordered Mediation","Mediator; Former Florida Statute  -  44.302  ","  44.102  "]
page[184]=["44.103.html","Court-Ordered Nonbinding Arbitration","Arbitrator; Arbitrators;","  44.103  "]
page[185]=["44.104.html","Voluntary Binding Arbitration and Voluntary Trial Resolution","  Arbitrator  - Arbitrators  ","  44.104  "]
page[186]=["44.106.html","Standards and Procedures for Mediators and Arbitrators; Fees","Mediator; Arbitrator;","44.106"]
page[187]=["44.107.html","Immunity for Arbitrators, Mediators, and Mediator Trainees","Former Florida Statute 44.307","44.107"]
page[188]=["44.108.html","Funding of Mediation and Arbitration","Mediator; Mediators; Arbitrator; Arbitrators;","44.108"]
page[189]=["44.201.html","Citizen Dispute Settlement Centers;","Establishment; Operation; Confidentiality","44.201"] 
page[190]=["rule_1.700.html","Rule 1.700","Rule of Civil Procedure; Rules Common to Mediation and Arbitration","  Rules of Civil Procedure  - Mediator  - Mediators - Arbitrator  -  Arbitrators  "]
page[191]=["rule_1.710.html","Rule 1.710","Rule of Civil Procedure; Mediation Rules ","Rules of Civil Procedure; Mediator; Mediators;"]
page[192]=["rule_1.720.html","Rule 1.720","Rule of Civil Procedure; Mediation Procedures","Rules of Civil Procedure; Mediator; Mediators;"]
page[193]=["rule_1.730.html","Rule 1.730","Rule of Civil Procedure; Completion of Mediation ","Rules of Civil Procedure; Mediator; Mediators;"]
page[194]=["rule_1.750.html","Rule 1.750","County Court Actions; Rule of Civil Procedure; Limitation on Referral to Mediation","Rules of Civil Procedure; Mediator; Mediators;"]
page[195]=["rule_1.800.html","Rule 1.800","Exclusions From Arbitration; Rule of Civil Procedure","Rules of Civil Procedure; Arbitrator; Arbitrators;"]
page[196]=["rule_1.810.html","Rule 1.810","Selection and Compensation of Arbitrators; Rule of Civil Procedure","Rules of Civil Procedure; Arbitrator; Arbitrators;"]
page[197]=["rule_1.830.html","RULE 1.830","Voluntary Binding Arbitration; Rule of Civil Procedure","Rules of Civil Procedure; Arbitrator; Arbitrators;"]
page[198]=["44.1011.html","Mediation Alternatives to Judicial Action - Definitions"," Arbitration "," Nonadversarial  Process "] 
page[199]=["clu-050310.html","  Fourth DCA Reverses Verdict Where Trial Court Failed To Give Intervening Medical Negligence Instruction<br />Where Defense Was Strongly Premised On Argument That Plaintiffs Surgeries<br />Following Accident Were Unnecessary  ","  Nason v. Shafranski  ","  MRI  "] 
page[200]=["clu-050410.html","  Hillsborough Circuit Court Rules That Insurers Cannot Apply Opps Cap To Limit<br />Reimbursement For Non-Hospital, Non-Emergency MRI Services Under 2008 PIP Statute  ","AFO Imaging, Inc. v. Peak Property & Casualty Insurance Corporation  ","  fee schedule - payment limitation  "]
page[201]=["clu-050510.html","  Fifth DCA Reverses Order Allowing Defendant To Videotape CME Of Plaintiff  ","  Prince v. Mallari  ","  compulsory medical examination -  Video  "]
page[202]=["clu-050610.html","  Third District Court Of Appeals Clarifies Purpose Of A Pure Bill Of   Discovery  ","  Venezia Lakes Homeowners Association, Inc. v. Precious Homes At Twin Lakes Property Owners Association, Inc.,  ","  Kirlin v. Green  "]
page[203]=["clu-051010.html","  Florida Supreme Court Concludes That While Excess Judgment May Not Always Be Required For<br />Bad Faith Cause Of Action, Insured Must Prove It Sustained Damages As A Result Of Insurers Bad Faith  ","  certified questions  -  certified question ","  Perera v. USF&amp;G  "]
page[204]=["news-051010.html","  Kirton v. Fields Reversed  ","  Minor's Right To Sue For Injuries  ","  Natural Guardian's Right to Waive And Release Claims -  &#167;744.301 - Natural  Guardian  "]
page[205]=["clu-111309.html","  Damages  ","  Wrongful Act  ","  Bryant  v.  Tarman - Bryant v. Tarman  "] 
page[206]=["clu-111609.html","  Private Right Of Action  ","  EOB  ","  United Automobile Insurance Company v. A 1st Choice Healthcare Systems - 627.736  "]
page[207]=["clu-111709.html","  State Farm Florida Ins. Co. v. Nichols  ","  Fifth District Court of Appeal Interprets When Insuers are Obligated to Pay for Subsurface Sinkhole Repairs  ","  Sinkhole  "]
page[208]=["clu-111809.html","  Denial Of Fee Award For Motion To Enforce Settlement Of A PIP Suit  ","  Espaillat v. Permanent Gen. Assurance Corp.  ","  627.428  "]
page[209]=["clu-111809.html","  Miami Dade Circuit Court Reverses Summary Judgment In Favor Of Provider  ","  United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Comprehensive Health Center, Inc. (a/a/o Erla Telusnor)  ","  Treating Physicians Should Not Receive Expert Witness Fees For Depositions  "]
page[209]=["clu-112309.html","  Fourth DCA Invalidates A Proposal For Settlement Filed In Declaratory Action <br /> Finding That It Failed To Adequately Address The Claim For Injunctive Relief  ","  Palm Beach Polo Holdings Inc. v. Equestrian Club Estates Property Owners Ass'n  ","  768.79  "]
page[210]=["clu-120209.html","  Fourth DCA Holds That PIP Insurer Is Not Required To Obtain IME Before Denying Claim For Medical Benefits  "," Central Magnetic Imaging Open MRI of Plantation, Ltd. (a/a/o Evelyn Deshommes) v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co - 627.736 (7)(a)  ","  IME  "]
page[211]=["clu-120309.html","  Fourth DCA Reverses Dismissal Based On Estoppel, Waiver Or Election Of Remedies  "," Bueno v. Workman  ","  Estoppel  "]
page[212]=["clu-120309.html","  Fourth DCA Finds That Laser Hair Removal Is Medical Procedure And Subject To The Requirements Of Chapter 766  "," Dr. Navarro's Vein Centre of the Palm Beach, Inc. v. Miller  ","  Navarro  Chapter 766  "]
page[213]=["clu-120409.html","  Third DCA Clarifies That Statute Requires Substantial Compliance With Claim Form Requirements<br />And That Omissions And Defects Can Be Cured By Later Submissions  "," United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Professional Med. Group  ","  Gaston Botta - disclosure and acknowledgment form  "]
page[214]=["clu-120809.html","  FIGA Bound By The Insolvent Insurer's Failure To Notify The Insured Of Its Right To Participate<br /> In A Mediation Program  "," The Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, Inc. v. Shadow Wood Condominium Association  ","  627.7015  "]
page[215]=["clu-120909.html","  FIGA Precluded From Asserting The Appraisal Process After Right To Mediation Statue (&#167;627.7015)<br /> Held Not To Violate The Impairment Of Contracts Clause Of The Constitution  "," Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, Inc. v. Devon Neighborhood Association  ","  627.7015  "]
page[216]=["clu-122109.html","  PIP Benefits  ","  GAP Period  ","  Walsh v. GEICO General Ins. Co.  "]
page[217]=["clu-122809.html","  First District Affirms Order Requiring Production Of Materials<br />Protected By Work Product Privilege  "," Work Product Privilege ","  Paradise Pines Health Care Assoc., LLC v. Bruce  "]
page[218]=["clu-031810.html","  MRI Facility Not Required To Include License Number In Block 31  ","  CMS-1500  ","   USAA Cas. Ins. Co. v. Pembroke Pines MRI, Inc. -  627.732 "]
page[219]=["clu-032210.html","  Billing Practices Of Non-Party Hospital Are Discoverable Provided Its Trade Secrets Are Kept Confidential  ","  Columbia Hospital (Palm Beaches) Ltd. Partnership v. Hasson, et. al.   ","  Discovery  "]
page[220]=["clu-032310.html","  Temporary Substitute Auto  ","  Geico v. Shazier  ","  Avis - Rental Vehicle  -  Rental Car  "]
page[220]=["clu-032410.html","  Fourth District Court Of Appeal Finds School Board Owes No Duty To Children Walking To the Bus Stop  ","  Francis v. School Board of Palm Beach County  ","  negligence tort suit  "]
page[221]=["clu-033010.html","  Insurance Broker Can Be Liable To Insurance Company For His Negligent Or Intentional Misrepresentations Of<br />Facts Material To Risks Assumed By Insurance Company  ","  Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation Inc. v. First Indemnity Insurance Services, Inc.  ","  Material Misrepresentation  "]
page[222]=["clu-040110.html","  Insured's Breach Of Duty - Insurer Materially Altered The Terms Of The Defense<br />Unauthorized Settlement  ","  Mid-Continent Casualty Company v. American Pride Building Company, LLC,  ","  Insurance Coverage"  ]
page[223]=["clu-040110a.html","  First DCA Interprets UM Statutory Renewal Clause To Require Only Annual Notice Of<br /> UM Coverage Option, Even On Policies That Renew Every Six Months  ","  Wolf v. Progressive American Insurance Company  ","  Uninsured Motorist  "]
page[224]=["frcp_2010_changes.html","  Proposed Changes To The Rules Of Civil Procedure  ","  1.080  -  1.285  -  1.310  -  1.340  -  1.351  -  1.360  -  1.420  -  1.442  -  1.470  -  1.480  "," Rule Of Civil Procedure  "]
page[225]=["clu-041310.html","  First DCA Reverses Denial Of Appraisal, Finding That Policy Did Not Have A Time Limit On <br />Demanding Appraisal And Compelling Appraisal For Items Not Yet Adjusted Because <br />It Was Unknown If Parties Disputed The Amount Of Loss Requiring An Appraisal  "," American Capital Assurance Corporation v. Courtney Meadows Apartment , L.L.P.,","  motion to compel  "]
page[226]=["clu-042710.html","  Third DCA Finds It Within Court's Discretion To Compel Appraisal<br />While Also Preserving Coverage Defenses For Insurer  ","  Sunshine State Ins. Co. v. Rawlins  ","  Paradise Plaza  "]
page[227]=["clu-042810.html","  Second DCA Asks Supreme Court To Revisit Constitutionality Of Cap On<br /> Noneconomic Damages In Med Mal Cases; Also Finds Pain And Suffering<br /> Can Be Awarded To Parent Even When They Do Not Testify<br />  ","  Parham v. Fla. Health Sciences Center, Inc. (d/b/a Tampa General Hospital)  ","   766.209  "]
page[228]=["clu-042910.html","  First DCA Addresses Valued Policy Law Where Damages Caused By Flood And Wind,<br />But Jury Determined That Wind Caused Total Loss And Claim For<br />Set Off For Amounts Paid By Flood Insurer"," Florida Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company v. Mathis "," Cox "]
page[229]=["clu-052410.html","  Second DCA Reaffirms That Expert Testimony Required To Support Attorney Fee Awards  ","  Joint and Several  "," attorney fees "]
page[230]=["clu-052510.html","  Fifth DCA Reverses Summary Judgment Based On Defense Of Sudden And Unexpected Loss Of<br />Consciousness Where Records Indicated Defendant Had Been<br />Experiencing Significant Symptoms Prior To Accident","  vasculopath  ","  aneurysm  "]
page[231]=["clu-052710.html","  Fifth DCA Aligns Itself With Fourth To Grant Certiorari To Protect Individual Defendant From<br />Court Order Compelling Production Of Cell Phone Sim Cards And<br />Computer Hard Drives In Wrongful Death Action  ","  Holland v. Barfield  ","  Menke  v.  Broward  County School Board - Rule 1.350 - 1.350 - Hard Drive - Cell Phones "]
page[232]=["clu-060110.html","  Fourth DCA Rules That Venue For Bad Faith Claims Handling Claim Is Permissible In County Where<br />Alleged Bad Faith Occurred And Not Where Adjuster Who Is<br />Alleged To Have Committed The Bad Faith Is Located  ","  American Vehicle Ins. Co. v. Goheagan  ","  motion to transfer venue  "]
page[233]=["clu-062110.html","  Second District Rules That Health Insurer's Recovery Is Limited By<br />Statutory Formula In &#167;768.74, Even If Contract Provides<br />A Full Right Of Reimbursement  "," Ingenix  v.  Ham  ","  Contracts -  Reimbursement  -  United Healthcare   "]
page[234]=["clu-062310.html","  Fourth DCA Rejects Eleventh Circuit's Ruling In Three Palms Pointe That<br />Insurer Is Limited To Challenging Coverage For The Loss As A<br />Whole Once An Appraisal Award Has Been Made&#8212; Specifically Ruling That<br />Insurer Can Contest Part Of Liability Post-Appraisal,<br />Without Challenging Coverage As A Whole  ","  631.51  ","  FIGA  -  Olympus  "]
page[235]=["clu-062410.html","  Trial &amp; Evidence  "," Third DCA Rules That The Changing Of Legal Theories To<br />Reach The Ultimate Conclusion About The Relation Back Of The<br />Complaint Did Not Alter The General Fact Situation Out of Which The Claim Arose ","   Flores   v.   Riscomp  "]
page[236]=["clu-070610.html","  Insurance   Coverage  "," Third DCA Holds That Coverage Will Not Be Provided Under A Policy Where<br />The Insured Failed To Disclose All Drivers Of A<br />Vehicle As Required By Policy Provision   ","  Telemundo Television Studios, LLC v Aequicap Ins. Co.  "]
page[237]=["clu-070710.html","  Insurance   Coverage  ","  Third DCA Finds No Coverage Under CGL Policy for Damages Resulting From<br />Insured's Faulty Workmanship That Damaged The Real Property On Which<br />The Insured Was Working, But Finding Coverage For Damages Resulting From<br />Insured's Faulty Workmanship That Damaged Property That Was Not<br />Within The Scope Of The Insured's Contract  ","  Nova   Casualty   Co v.   Willis  "]
page[238]=["clu-063010.html","Examination Under Oath","  Southern District Of Florid Dismisses Class Action Against Insurer,<br />Confirms That EUO Is Condition Precedent To Obtaining PIP Coverage","  Nu&#241;ez v. GEICO Gen. Ins. Co.  -  EUO "]
page[239]=["clu-071510.html","Trial &amp; Evidence","  Third DCA Reluctantly Reverses Summary Judgment Ruling That Despite<br />Strong Indications That Deposition Testimony Was False,<br />Trial Judge Was Mandated By Florida Rules To Leave Credibility Determinations To The Jury  ","  Bradley v. Cooper  "]
page[240]=["clu-071910.html","  Medical Malpractice  ","  Third DCA Affirms Summary Judgment For Hospital Where<br />Record Was Clear That Surgeon Was Not Agent Of Hospital  "," Quesada v. Mercy Hospital, Inc.  "]
page[241]=["clu-072010.html","  Insurance Coverage Issues  ","  Third DCA Finds That Insurance Broker Ceases To Be<br />Insureds Agent After Policy Is Issued And Binder Expires,<br />Reverses Summary Judgment For Insurer Where Terms Of Binder were Ambiguous  ","  Medley Warehouses, LC v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.  "]
page[242]=["clu-012910.html","  First DCA Finds That PIP Statute Requires Medical Provider To Submit Bills for Payment And<br />That Bills Submitted By Insured Directly Are Not<br />Properly Submitted To Trigger Payment Requirement  ","  627.736  "," State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Pressley "]
page[243]=["clu-072110.html","  Discovery  ","  Fourth DCA Grants Insurer's Petition For Certiorari Review Of Order Compelling<br />Production Of The Insurers Claim And Underwriting File And<br />Documents From The Insurers Litigation File  ","  State Farm Fla. Ins. Co. v Kramer - Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280  "]
page[244]=["clu-072210.html","  Medical Malpractice  ","  Fourth DCA Finds That Statutory Non-Delegable Duty To Provide<br />Non-Negligent Anesthesia Services Does Not Apply Where Patient Directly Contracts With<br />His Own Selected Anesthesiologist For Surgery Performed At Ambulatory Surgical Center  ","  Kristensen-Kepler v. Cooney  "]
page[245]=["90.403.html","  Exclusion on Grounds of Prejudice or Confusion  ","  Florida Statute 90.403  ","  third-party benefits  "]
page[246]=["clu-072610.html","  Products Liability, Trial, Evidence  ","  Trial Court Committed Error In Applying The Substantial Similarity Test To<br />Demonstrative Evidence Not Intended To Recreate An Accident,<br />Rather Support Defenses In A Products Liability Case  "," Mitsubishi Motors Corporation v. Laliberte  -  90.403  "]
page[247]=["news-072710.html","  Flood Insurance Reform And Priorities Act of 2010  "," NFIP ","  H.R. 5114  "]
page[248]=["rule_1.525.html","  Rule 1.525 Motions For Costs And Attorneys Fees","  party seeking judgment   ","  Taxing Costs  "]
page[249]=["clu-072710.html","Attorney's Fees","  First DCA Upholds Denial Of Attorney's Fees, Finding That Motion for Fees Was<br />Untimely Because Post-Verdict Motions Did Not Toll Time for Filing Motion  ","  Jackson v. Anthony - Attorney Fees  -  Attorney Fee "]
page[250]=["clu-080310.html","  Personal Injury Protection  ","  Third DCA Grants Insurer's Petition For Certiorari Review And<br />Quashed The Decision Of The Circuit Court Holding The Insured Who Had Made An<br />Unqualified Assignment Of Benefits Had No Standing To Sue The Insurer  ","  United Automobile Insurance Company v. Otero -  PIP "]
page[251]=["clu-080510.html","  Proposal For Settlement  ","  Fourth DCA Finds Proposal For Settlement To Be Enforceable<br />Rejects Argument That Requirement For Plaintiff To Acknowledge That Defendant Does Not<br />Admit Liability Was not Ambiguous And That Proposal Was Otherwise Compliant  ","  Donovan Marine  , Inc. v.   Delmonico  "]
page[252]=["clu-081210.html","  Personal Injury Protection  ","  Broward Circuit court Reverses Order Striking Expert Witness Who Failed To Produce<br />IME Reports For Non-Parties And Failing To consider Expert's Deposition<br />Testimony In Addressing Summary Judgment - Also Affirmed No Cause Of Action Exists<br />For Insurer's Failure To Provide EOB  ","  United Auto. Ins. Co. v. NDNC Neurological Treatment Center (a/a/o Cheyene Duncan) - 627.736  "]
page[253]=["clu-072810.html"," Discovery ","Fourth DCA Reverses Order Finding That Insurer Waived Attorney Client And<br />Work Product Privileges Attaching To Claims, Litigation And<br />Underwriting Files When Motion For Protective Order Asserted Only That Plaintiff Was<br />Not ‘Legally Entitled’ To The Documents And Did Not<br /> Specifically Assert Those Privileges"," State Farm Fla. Ins. Co. v. Kramer "]
page[254]=["clu-081310.html","  Personal Injury Protection  ","  Fifteenth Judicial Circuit Affirms Final Judgment Finding That<br />Insurer's Request For Clinic Verification To Establish That Provider Was<br />Eligible To Receive Payments For PIP Benefits Was Not A Request For<br />Information Within Scope of 627.736(6)(b) And<br />Did Not Toll Time For Insurer To Pay Bills  ","  Mercury Ins. Co. of Fla. v. Med Manage Group, Inc. (a/a/o Michael Bergey)  "]
page[255]=["clu-081610.html","  Personal Injury Protection  ","  Second DCA Finds That 2008 PIP Statute Was Not Retroactive And<br />Cannot Be Applied To Policies That Were Not In Effect On Or After January 1, 2008,<br />Even Though Medical Treatment In Issue Was Performed After January 1, 2008  ","  GEICO Indemnity Co. v. Physicians Group, LLC (a/a/o Paul Androski) - 627.7407  "]
page[256]=["clu-082310.html","  Personal Injury Protection  ","  Miami Dade Appellate Court Concludes That Omnibus Insured Not Obligated To<br />Submit To EUO And That Insurer Could Not Deny Coverage For Failure To Attend EUO  ","  United Auto. Ins. Co. v. Miami Neurology Rehab Specialist (a/a/o Yoan Diaz Alfonso  "]
page[257]=["clu-082410.html","  Insurance Coverage  ","  Palm Beach Appellate Court Confirms No Coverage For Theft Claims Where<br />Specifically Excluded Driver Was The One Who Stole The Car  ","  Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. The Sign Store, Inc. et. al  "]
page[258]=["clu-090710.html","  Attorney's Fees&#8212;Proposals For Settlement  ","  Fourth DCA Affirms The Trial Court's Ruling Finding<br />A Proposal For Settlement Was Ambiguous And Could Not Support An Award Of<br />Attorney's Fees Under The Offer Of Judgment Statute  "," Attorney Fees - Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Pollinger - Attorney Fee "]
page[259]=["clu-072910.html","  Releases  ","  Second DCA Reverses Summary Judgment In Favor Of Insurer Finding That<br />Factual Issues Remained As To Whether Insured Intended To Release<br />Bodily Injury Claims When Insurer Paid Property Damage Only,<br />Despite The Fact That Clear Language Of Release Included Bodily Injury Claims  ","  McKeever v. Rushing  "]
page[260]=["clu-091410.html","  Torts  ","  Fifth DCA Upholds Summary Judgment For Defendant On Negligent Selection Of<br />An Independent Contractor Action Where Plaintiff's Cause Of Action And<br />Undisputed Facts Did Not Show Defendant Was<br />Proximate Cause Of Plaintiff's Injury  "," Davies v. Commercial Metals Co.  "]
page[261]=["clu-092910.html","  Attorney's Fees  ","  Second DCA Certifies Conflict With Soto And Finds That 627.428 Fees<br />Incurred Solely As A Result Of The Underlying Carrier's Actions Are Not<br />'Covered Claims' For Which FIGA Is Liable  ","  FIGA v. Petty - Attorneys Fees - Attorney Fees  - Attorney Fee"]
page[262]=["clu-100810.html","  Medicare   Secondary Payor Act, Settlement  ","Eleventh Circuit Rules That Probate Court's Determination Of<br />The Value Of Survivor Claims Under Florida Wrongful Death Act And Apportionment Of Undifferentiated Settlement Of<br />Wrongful Death Claim For Purposes Of Allocating Amount Of Settlement Attributable To<br />Medical expenses Would Be Upheld for Purposes Of Determining Amount Owed To<br />Medicare Under Medicare Secondary Payor Statute  ","  Bradley v. Sebelius  "]
page[263]=["clu-110210.html","  PFS - Attorney Fees  ","Second DCA Affirms Denial Of Attorney Fee Under Proposal for Settlement Where Proposal<br />Required Release But Failed To Either Attach Proposed<br />Release Or Provide Summary Of Release Terms","  Darrow  v.  Heitman - Attorney's Fees - Attorneys Fees "]
page[264]=["clu-110310.html","  Bad   Faith  ","First DCA Finds That Venue For Declaratory Action Filed By Insurer To Determine If<br />It Acted In Bad Faith Lies In The County Where Settlement Would Ultimately Be Accepted-<br />Which Is County Where Plaintiff Resides And Estate Was Opened ","Mercury Ins. Co. of Fla. v. Jackson"]
page[265]=["clu-111610.html","  PIP - IME - Certiorari Jurisdiction ","Florida Supreme Court Concludes That Whether Refusal To<br />Attend IME Is Unreasonable Is A Question Of Fact On For Which Insurer Bears The Burden Of Proof And<br />Even An Unreasonable Refusal To Attend Only Eliminates Obligation To Pay For Treatment Subsequent To IME,<br />Not Treatment Provided Before The IME Was Noticed","  Custer v. United Auto Ins. Co.  "]
page[266]=["rule_1.071.html","  Rule 1.071  ","Constitutional Challenge To State Statute Or County Or Municipal Charter,<br />Ordinance, Or Franchise; Notice By Party","  Notice By Party  "]
page[267]=["clu-101209.html","Third DCA Issues En Banc Opinion Clarifying Requirements For Denying Benefits Pursuant To 627.736 "," Personal Injury Protection "," PIP Benefits - 627.736 -  Medical Report  - United Automobile Insurance Company v. Santa Fe Medical Center "]
page[268]=["clu-112310.html","Fifth DCA Reinstates Nominal Verdict Finding That Prior Inconsistent Deposition Testimony Of<br />Expert Constituted Substantive Evidence To Support Jury's Verdict",""," Trial - Evidence - Damages - 90.801 - Corbett v. Wilson "]
page[269]=["clu-112410.html","First DCA Holds That ''Other Insurance'' Clause Inapplicable Where Insured Had<br />Separate Wind And Flood Policies, Each Covering A Different Peril","Homeowner's Insurance - Insurance Coverage - Property Insurance - Evidence","''Total Loss Recovery Rule'' Likewise Inapplicable If The Insured Is Able To Prove A Covered Peril Caused Total Loss"]
page[270]=["48.21.html","Return Of Execution Of Process","Service Of Process"," 48.21 "] 
page[271]=["48.171.html","Service On Nonresident Motor Vehicle Owners","Service Of Process"," 48.171 "]
page[272]=["48.193.html","Acts Subjecting Person To Jurisdiction Of Courts Of State"," Jurisdiction "," 48.193 "]
page[273]=["48.194.html","Personal Service Outside State"," Service Of Process "," 48.194 "]
page[274]=["744.301.html"," Natural Guardians "," Guardianship "," 744.301 "]
page[275]=["744.3021.html","Guardians of Minors "," Guardianship "," 744.3021 "]
page[276]=["744.3025.html","Claims of Minors"," Guardianship "," 744.3025 "]
page[277]=["744.309.html","Who May Be Appointed Guardian Of A Resident Ward"," Guardianship "," 744.309 "]
page[278]=["744.387.html","Settlement of Claims"," Guardianship "," 744.387 "]
page[279]=["744.441.html","Powers of Guardian Upon Court Approval"," Guardianship "," 744.441 "]
page[280]=["744.444.html","Power Of Guardian Without Court Approval"," Guardianship "," 744.444 "]
page[281]=["744.474.html","Reasons For Removal Of Guardian"," Guardianship "," 744.474 "]
page[282]=["440.015.html","Legislative Intent"," Workers' Compensation "," 440.015 "]
page[283]=["440.02.html","Definitions"," Workers' Compensation "," 440.02 "]
page[284]=["440.09.html ","Coverage"," Workers' Compensation "," 440.09 "]
page[285]=["440.091.html","Law Enforcement Officer, Firefighter, Emergency Medical Technician, Or Paramedic"," Workers' Compensation "," 440.091 "]
page[286]=["440.093.html","Mental And Nervous Injuries"," Workers' Compensation "," 440.093 "]
page[287]=["440.10.html","Liability For Compensation"," Workers' Compensation "," 440.10 "]
page[288]=["440.105.html","Prohibited Activities; Reports; Penalties; Limitations"," Workers' Compensation "," 440.105 "]
page[289]=["440.14.html","Determination Of Pay"," Workers' Compensation "," 440.14 "]
page[290]=["440.15.html","Compensation For Disability"," Workers' Compensation "," 440.15 "]
page[291]=["440.151.html","Occupational Diseases"," Workers' Compensation "," 440.151 "]
page[292]=["440.16.html","Compensation For Death"," Workers' Compensation "," 440.16 "]
page[293]=["440.185.html","Notice Of Injury Or Death; Reports; Penalties For Violations "," Workers' Compensation "," 440.185 "]
page[294]=["440.24.html","Enforcement Of Compensation Orders; Penalties"," Workers' Compensation "," 440.24 "]
page[295]=["440.34.html","Attorney's Fees; Costs"," Workers' Compensation "," 440.34 "]
page[296]=["440.385.html","Florida Self-Insurers Guaranty Association, Incorporated"," Workers' Compensation "," 440.385 "]
page[297]=["clu-112410a.html","Second DCA Revises Opinion Addressing Applicability Of Amended PIP Statute<br />To Policies Issued Prior To January 1, 2008 And Clarifies That Opinion Is<br />Limited To Facts Of Case Which Involve A Policy That Was Not<br />In Effect On January 1, 2008&#8212; All Other Holdings Withdrawn","PIP -  Personal Injury Protection  -  Statutory Interpretation  ","  GEICO   Indemnity Co. v. Physicians Group, LLC, (a/a/o Paul Androski)"]
page[298]=["clu-arch-fees-costs.html","Search Archive:  Attorney's Fees - Costs "," Attorneys Fees  ","  Attorney Fee - Attorney's Fee "]
page[299]=["clu-arch-bad_faith.html","Search Archive:  Bad Faith","Extra-Contractual Litigation"," Extra Contractual Litigation"]
page[300]=["clu-arch-contracts.html","Search Archive:  Contracts  ","  Contract ",""]
page[301]=["clu-arch-discovery.html","Search Archive:   Discovery "," Discoverable "," Privilege Log  "]
page[302]=["clu-arch-euo-ime.html","Search Archive:  Examination Under Oath - Independent Medical Examination "," EUO - IME "," Compulsory Medical Examination "]
page[303]=["clu-arch-coverage.html","Search Archive:  Insurance Coverage "," Insurance Policy "," Covered Peril "]
page[304]=["clu-arch-medmal.html","Search Archive:  Medical Malpractice "," Medical Negligence "," Med-Mal - MedMal - Med Mal "]
page[305]=["clu-arch-pip.html","Search Archive:  Personal Injury Protection "," PIP "," Assignment Of Benefits "]
page[306]=["clu-arch-property-ins.html","Search Archive:  Property Insurance "," Homeowner's Insurance - Home Owners Insurance "," Property Damage - Sinkhole - Windstorm - Wind Storm - Homeowners Insurance "]
page[307]=["clu-arch-proposal-settlement.html","Search Archive:  Proposal For Settlement "," PFS "," Release "]
page[308]=["clu-arch-releases.html","Search Archive:  Releases "," Release "," Bodily Injury "]
page[309]=["clu-arch-rules-civil.html","Search Archive:  Rules Of Civil Procedure "," Filing Motions "," Motion "]
page[310]=["clu-arch-torts.html","Search Archive:  Torts "," Tortious "," Tort "]
page[311]=["clu-arch-trial_evidence.html","Search Archive:  Trial &amp; Evidence "," Verdict - Error "," Testimony - Deposition "]
page[312]=["clu-arch-um-uim.html","Search Archive:  Uninsured Motorist "," Underinsured Motorist "," UM - UIM "]
page[313]=["clu-arch-wrongful_death.html","Search Archive:  Wrongful Death "," Duty "," Estate "]
page[314]=["clu-113010.html","Third DCA Reverses Appraisal Order Due To Insured's Failure To Produce<br />Documents And Allow Documents And Allow Access To The Property","  Property Insurance  ","  Citizens Property Insurance Corporation v. Galeria Villas Condominium Association, Inc.  "]
page[315]=["clu-121310.html","Fourth DCA Holds That Excess Insurer Complied With 627.727(2) Statutory Requirement<br />That It ''Make Available'' Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Protection Where It<br />Provided Insured With TheExcess UM/UIM Coverage, Upon The Condition That<br />The Insured Purchase UM/UIM Coverage Under Its Primary Policy","Uninsured Motorist - Underinsured Motorist "," Nieves v. North River Insurance Company "]
page[316]=["clu-121410.html","Fourth DCA Invalidates UM Policy Provision Requiring Plaintiff<br />To Sue Tortfeasor As Condition Of UM Coverage"," Saris v. State Farm "," Uninsured Motorist - UM - UIM "]
page[317]=["clu-122010.html","Florida Supreme Court Holds That In Order To Preserve A Sustained Objection For<br />Trial Court's Consideration Of A Motion For New Trial, Based On Attorney<br />Misconduct, Complaining Party Must Timely Move For Mistrial"," Companioni v. City of Tampa "," Trial, Appellate Issues, Preservation Of Error, Mistrial "]
page[318]=["clu-122310.html","Third DCA Upholds Award Of Attorney's Fees Pursuant To Offer Of Judgment Statute<br />Holding That Defendant's Demand Letter To Plaintiff After Proposal For<br />Settlement Was Sent To Plaintiff Did Not Invalidate The Proposal And That<br />A General Release Including ''Past, Present, And Future Affiliates''<br />Of Plaintiff Did Not Invalidate Proposal","Jessla Construction Corporation v. Miami-Dade County School Board<br /> Attorney's Fee - Attorneys Fee "," Attorney's  Fees - Attorney Fees"]
page[319]=["clu-122710.html","Fifth DCA Upholds Dismissal Of Complaint Based On Fraud On The Court","Wenwei Sun, Xiaofen Xu, and Yuetian Sun v. Gilberto Aviles and Manuel Irizarry"," Torts - Dismissal - Fraud On Court "]
page[320]=["clu-122810.html","Fourth DCA Denies Certiorari Review Despite Expressly Finding That County And<br />Circuit Courts Committed Clear Legal Error, Holds That Something More Than<br />The Obligation To Pay A Money Judgment That Should Not Otherwise Be Owed<br />Was Required To Justify The Narrow Second Tier Review Requested In This Case"," United Automobile Insurance Company v. Palm Chiropractic Center, Inc.(a/a/o Joyce Thomas) "," PIP - Insurance - Certiorari - Appellate Issues "]
page[321]=["clu-122910.html","First DCA Rules That Summary Judgment In Favor Of Insurer Is Proper Where<br />Benefits Are Exhausted Before Insurer Is Served With Lawsuit&#8212; Provider Cannot<br />Maintain Suit For Sole Purpose Of Pursuing Claim For Penalties, Interest And<br />Attorney's Fees On Benefits Reduced Or Denied Prior To Exhaustion Of Benefits","Richard Sheldon, DC (a/a/o Travis Baliel) v. United Services Automobile Association - Attorney's Fees "," PIP - Personal Injury Protection - 627.428 -  Attorney Fee"]
page[322]=["clu-123010.html","Second DCA Holds That A Claim For Upcoding And Unbundling<br />Does Not Support A Claim For Civil Theft","Nodal v. Infinity Auto Insurance Company","Attorney's Fees - Torts"]
page[323]=["clu-010311.html","A Survivor Claim May Be Brought By A Decedent's Biological Child Where The Mother<br />Was Married To Another Man At The Time Of The Child's Conception And Birth","  Greenfield v. Daniels  ","  Wrongful Death - 768.18 - 768.17 "]
page[324]=["clu-010411.html","Second DCA Upholds Nominal Proposal For Settlement And<br />Reverses Order Denying Defendant Fees"," Gawtrey v. Hayward - Proposal For Settlement - Attorney Fees "," Attorney's Fees - Attorney Fee "]
page[325]=["clu-010511.html","Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.390 11th Judicial Circuit,<br />Miami-Dade County Holds That Treating Physicians Are Entitled To<br />Expert Witness Fee For Attending Deposition Because The Language Of The Rule<br />Does Not Exclude ''Treating Physicians'' From The Definition Of Expert Witness&#8212;<br />Peer Review Affidavit Presented Factual Dispute Precluding<br />Summary Judgment In Favor Of Provider"," United Automobile Insurance Company v. Flagler Medical Center, Inc. (a/a/o Mercedes Maura) "," Civil Procedure - 627.736 "]
page[326]=["clu-010611.html"," First DCA Concludes That Collateral Source Rule Permits<br />Plaintiffs To equest Full Amount Of Past Medical Bills,<br />Despite Health Insurance Contractual Write-Offs "," Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Harrell "," Trial - Evidence - Damages "]
page[327]=["clu-011011.html","Southern District Dismisses Declaratory Action Seeking<br />Declarations As To Validity Of C0-Insurance Provision In<br />Policy And Hurricane Deductible Provision Which Violated Font Requirements Of<br />Statute And Disallows Breach Of Warranty Of Good Faith Claims"," Trianon Condominium Association, Inc. v. QBE Insurance Corporation "," Bad Faith "]
page[328]=["clu-012511.html","Judge Steinberg Of The Hillsborough County Court Affirms<br />Application Of NCCI Edits To PIP Bills; Disallows Use Of<br />97124 And 97140 On Same Dates Of Service","  Senpri Medical Center Inc. (a/a/o Benjamin Almeida) v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company  ","Personal Injury Protection, Insurance  -  627.736  "]
page[329]=["clu-012511a.html","Lake County Appellate Court Affirms Insured's Right To Reallocation Of<br />PIP And Med Pay Benefits, Even After PIP Exhausts But<br />Dissent Offers Key Argument To Contrary And Also Rules That<br />Insufficient Pre-Suit Demand Letter Not Fatal To Insured's Claim<br />Where Demand Would Have Been Futile Given That<br />Insurer Refused To Pay Further Benefits"," Personal Injury Protection - State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Henry ","  PIP - 627.736 "]
page[330]=["clu-012611.html","Dade County Circuit Court Holds That Insurer Waived Issue Of Defective<br />Pre-Suit Demand Letter, Which Failed To Include Assignment Or<br />Indicate Whether Payment Should Be Made To Provider Or Insured,<br />By Failing To Raise The Issue Until After Suit Was Filed By Insured"," United Automobile Insurance Company v. Perez "," Personal Injury Protection, Insurance - PIP - 627.736 "]
page[331]=["clu-012611a.html","Fifth DCA Grants Certiorari To Reverse Order<br />Striking Defense Expert For Discover Issues"," Heathrow Master Ass'n, Inc., v. Zulia ","  Torts, Trial, Expert Witnesses, Discovery, Sanctions  "]
page[332]=["clu-012611b.html","Eleventh Circuit-Miami-Dade County Fails To Follow Long Standing Law<br />On Accord And Satisfaction, Holds That A Provider's Acceptance And<br />Cashing Of Insruer's Check, Which Stated ''Final/Final P.I.P. Benefits Payment''<br />On the Check, Did Not Amount to Accord And Satisfaction Without<br />A Showing Of Mutual Intent"," Ann K. Medical Office Inc. (a/a/o Rosa Delgado), v. United Auto "," Personal Injury Protection - PIP "]
page[333]=["clu-020311.html","Third DCA Reverses Sanctions Against UM Carrier For Mistrial Caused By<br />Carrier's Medical Expert &#8211; Finds No Evidence Of Bad Faith On The Part Of<br />The Carrier Caused The Expert's Behavior &#8211; Remanded And Plaintiff Permitted To<br />Seek Sanctions Against The Expert Directly"," State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Swindoll "," Trial, Sanctions, Expert Witnesses "]
page[334]=["clu-021511.html","Supreme Court Resolves Conflict Between First And Fifth DCA On Application Of<br />Safe Harbor Provision Of 57.105 - Determines That Statute In Effect<br />On Date When Frivolous Claims Were Filed Applies"," The Bionetics Corp. v. Kenniasty "," Attorney Fees, Frivolous Claims Or Defenses, Statutory Interpretation "]
page[335]=["clu-021711.html","First DCA Concludes That When Evaluating Whether Proposal For Settlement Was<br />Made In Good Faith For Purposes Of Imposing Attorney's Fees, Trial Court<br />Is Required To Consider Defendant's Explanation And Determine Whether,<br />Despite Consideration Of Objective Factors, Defendant Had Subjectively<br />Reasonable Belief On Which To Base Its Offer"," Attorney Fees, Proposal for Settlement ","Attorney Fee - Arrowood Indemnity Co.Inc. v. Acosta - Attorney's Fee "]
page[336]=["clu-021711a.html","According to Fourth DCA, Insured May Not Seek Payment Of UM Compensation Against<br />Insurer Or Insurance Agent After Any Of The Insureds Have Executed Valid Statutory<br />Waiver Of UM Benefits, Even If Agent Allegedly Negligently Misrepresented Coverage"," Mitleider v. Brier Grieves Agency, Inc. "," Uninsured Motorist "]
page[337]=["clu-022111.html","Fifth DCA Joins Fourth And Third In Finding That UM Policy Condition Requiring Insured<br />To Join Tortfeasor In Litigation Is Contrary To Public Policy And Void"," Ruddy v. Carelli "," Uninsured Motorist Insurance "]
page[338]=["clu-022211.html","Third DCA Relies Upon Exceptions To<br />Independent Contractor Rules In Premises Liability Case"," Torts, Trial &amp; Evidence "," Fabregas V. North Miami Bakeries "]
page[339]=["clu-030111.html","Eleventh Circuit Court Of Appeals Certifies<br />Multiple Questions Regarding Proposals For<br />Settlement To Florida Supreme Court"," Attorney's Fees, Evidence &amp; Trial, Conflicts of Law - 768.79 - 1.442 - Attorney Fee - Proposal For Settlement "," Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Southeast Floating Docks, Inc. "]
page[340]=["clu-030211.html","Fifth DCA Affirms Fees Based On Proposal For<br />Settlement From Two Defendants To A Single<br />Plaintiff Where Amount From Each Defendant Was Clear"," Proposals For Settlement, Attorneys Fees "," Proposal For Settlement - Attorney Fee - Rossmore v. Smith - Attorney's Fees "]
page[341]=["clu-030311.html","Fourth DCA Reverses Summary Final Judgment Where Defendants Did Not<br />Meet Their Burden Of Showing The Absence Of Any Genuine<br />Issue Of Material Fact"," Wrongful Death - Searcy v. Zawackis "," 316.1235 "]
page[342]=["clu-031411.html","Fifth DCA Issues Writ Of Certiorari To Prevent Trial Court From Allowing<br />Bad Faith Case To Proceed While Appeal Of Underlying Case Is Pending"," Bad Faith - Insurance - UM Insurance "," Illinois National Insurance Company v. Bolen "]
page[343]=["clu-031611.html","Seventh Circuit (Volusia) Reverses Summary Judgment In Favor Of Insurer Where<br />Insured Incorrectly Advised Provider That He Had No Insurance And<br />Provider Submitted Bills Within 35 Days After Learning Of Correct Insurance Information"," PIP, Insurance, Statutory Interpretation "," Desaussure v. Direct General Insurance Company "]
page[344]=["legislation-2011.sb-1806.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature: Auto Insurance<br />Motor Vehicle Insurance - Personal Injury Protection "," SB 1806 - HB 1439","SB1806 - HB1439"]
page[345]=["legislation-2011.hb-0967.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature: HB 0967 Relating to<br />Personal Injury Protection Insurance"," HB-0967 - HB0967 - 967"," Horner "]
page[346]=["legislation-2011.sb-1694.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature: SB 1694 Relating to<br />Motor Vehicle Personal Injury Protection Insurance"," SB-1694 - SB1694 "," Richter "]
page[347]=["legislation-2011.hb-1411.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature: HB 1411 Relating to<br />Motor Vehicle Personal Injury Protection Insurance"," HB-1411 - HB1411 "," Boyd "]
page[348]=["legislation-2011.sb-1930.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature: SB 1930 Relating to<br />Motor Vehicle Personal Injury Protection Insurance"," SB-1930 - SB1930 "," Bogdanoff "]
page[349]=["legislation-2011.sb-0634.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature:<br />SB 0634 Relating to Citizens Property Ins. Corp./Prohibited Activities"," SB-0634 - SB0634 - 634 "," Simmons "]
page[350]=["legislation-2011.sb-1714.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature:<br />SB 1714 Relating to Citizens Property Insurance Corporation"," SB-1714 - SB1714 "," Hays "]
page[351]=["legislation-2011.hb-4181.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature:<br />HB 4181 Relating to Prohibited Activities of Citizens<br />Property Insurance Corporation"," HB-4181 - HB4181 ","Davis"]
page[352]=["legislation-2011.hb-1187.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature:<br />HB 1187 Relating to Civil Remedies Against Insurers"," HB-1187 - HB1187 "," Baxley "]
page[353]=["legislation-2011.sb-1592.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature:<br />SB 1592 Relating to Civil Remedies Against Insurers"," SB-1592 - SB1592 "," Thrasher "]
page[354]=["clu-031811.html","Florida Supreme Court Rules That In First Party<br />Bad Faith Action, Attorney-Client Privilege Applies To<br />Communications Between Insurer And Its Counsel When The<br />Attorney Is Giving Legal Advice To Insurer","  Genovese v. Provident Life &amp; Accident Insurance Company  ","  Bad Faith, Insurance, Discovery, Attorney Client Privilege  "]
page[355]=["legislation-2011.sb-1908.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature:<br />SB 1908  Relating to Insurance"," SB-1908 - SB1908 "," Smith &copy; "]
page[356]=["legislation-2011.hb-1167.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature:<br />HB 1167 Relating to Insurance"," HB-1167 - HB1167 "," Jenne "]
page[357]=["legislation-2011.sb-0510.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature:<br />SB 0510  Relating to Hurricane Loss Mitigation Program"," SB-0510 - SB0510 - 510 "," Frishe "]
page[358]=["legislation-2011.sb-0408.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature:<br />SB 0408 Relating to Property And Casualty Insurance"," SB-0408 - SB0408 - 408 ","Richter"]
page[359]=["legislation-2011.hb-0803.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature:<br />HB 0803 Relating to Property and Casualty Insurance"," HB-0803 - HB0803 "," Wood HB-803 "]
page[360]=["clu-032111.html","Third DCA Declines To Adopt APEX Doctrine But Limits Right To Depose<br />Apex Officers On Principles Similar To The Doctrine"," General Star Indemnity Company v. Atlantic Hospitality of Florida, LLC "," Discovery - Insurance - Depositions "]
page[361]=["legislation-2011.hb-0885.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature:<br />HB 0885 Relating to Residential Property Insurance)","HB-0885 - HB0885 - 885"," Wood "]
page[362]=["legislation-2011.sb-0938.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature:<br />SB 0938 Relating to Insurance ","SB-0938 - SB0938"," Auto Insurance - Storms"]
page[363]=["legislation-2011.hb-0947.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature:<br />HB 0947 Relating to Property Insurance Appraisal Umpires &amp;<br />Property Insurance Appraisers"," HB-0947 - HB0947 - 947 ","Artiles"]
page[364]=["legislation-2011.hb-1035.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature:<br />HB 1035 Relating to Condominium, Cooperative, and Homeowners' Associations"," HB-1035 - HB1035 "," Grant "] 
page[365]=["clu-032211.html","First DCA Affirms Summary Judgment In Favor Of Insurer Finding That<br />Three Option Letter Requirement Of 627.7282 Does Not Apply To Increase In<br />Premium Arising From Change Of Address Occurring With Renewal Of Policy Rather Than<br />Miscalculation Of Premium Based On Initial Application"," Insurance - Cancellation - Statutory Application "," Smith v. New Hampshire Indemnity Company "]  
page[366]=["legislation-2011.hb-1439.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature:<br />HB 1439 Relating to Motor Vehicle Insurance"," HB-1439 - HB1439 "," Grant "]
page[367]=["legislation-2011.hb-1243.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature:<br />HB 1243 Citizens Property Insurance Corporation"," HB-1243 - HB1243"," Boyd "]
page[368]=["clu-042111.html","Third DCA Affirms Bad Faith Judgment Finding That Evidence That Insurer<br />Promptly Paid Other Claims And Paid More Than Total Aggregate Limit Was Not<br />Relevant To Claim That Was Not Successfully Settled"," Bad Faith - 624.155 - 627.428 "," United Automobiel Insurance Company v. Estate of Stephen D. Levine "]
page[369]=["legislation-2011.hb-1157.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature:<br />HB 1157 General Matters Regarding Insurance"," HB-1157 - HB1157 "," Jenne "]
page[370]=["legislation-2011.sb-1750.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature:<br />SB 1750 Relating to Property Insurance Appraisers/Appraisal Umpires"," SB-1750 - SB1750 "," Diaz de la Portilla "]
page[371]=["legislation-2011.hb-4081.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature:<br />HB 4081 Repeal of Obsolete Insurance Provisions"," HB-4081 - HB4081 "," Horner "]
page[372]=["legislation-2011.hb-4099.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature:<br />HB 4099 Relating to Repeal of Property and Casualty Insurance Provisions"," HB-4099 - HB4099 "," Nelson "]
page[373]=["clu-042511.html"," Supreme Court Confirms That Graves Amendments Pre-Empts &#167;324.021(9)(b)2<br />And Eliminates Liability For Car Rental Companies Providing Short Term Leases -<br />Concludes That 324.021 Is Not A Financial Responsibility Law "," Torts - Motor Vehicles "," Vargas v. Enterprise Leasing Company "]
page[374]=["clu-042811.html"," Seminole County Court Rules That State Farm Policy Allowed Use Of<br />Statutory Fee Schedule And That Statute Adopted Medicare Pay System,<br />Excluding Only Identified Sections, And Thus OPPS Caps Applies "," V&amp;T Investment Partners v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company "," PIP - Insurance - 627.736 "]
page[375]=["clu-050511.html"," Fourth DCA Confirms That Demand Letter And Claim Forms Must Give<br />Insurer Notice Of Exact Amount Owed For Treatment-<br />Affirms Judgment In Favor Of Insurer"," MRI Associates of America, LLC (a/a/o Ebba Register) v. State Farm Fire &amp; Casualty Company "," PIP - Insurance - Personal Injury Protection "]
page[376]=["legislation-2011.sb-0142.html","Proposed Legislation By The 2011 Florida Legislature:<br />SB 0142 Relating to Negligence"," SB-0142 - SB0142 - SB 142 "," Richter "]
page[377]=["clu-051911.html"," Fourth DCA Rules That PIP Insurer May Not Elect To Use<br />Medicare Part B Fee Schedule Set Forth In Section 627.736(5)(a)(2)<br />When The Subject Policy Specifies That The PIP Insurer Will<br />Pay 80% Of Medically Necessary Expenses- Incorporation Of PIP Statute Into<br />Policy Did Not Give Insurer The Unilateral Right To Ignore<br />The Only Payment Methodology Referenced In The Policy ","  Kingsway Amigo Insurance Company v. Ocean Health, Incorporated (a/a/o Belizaire Gomez)  ",""]
page[378]=["clu-052011.html"," First DCA Holds That A Proposal For Settlement Under Section 768.79,<br />Florida Statutes, Does Not Cut Off A Prevailing Party's Claim For<br />Contractual Attorney's Fees And Costs Incurred After The Date Of<br />The Proposal So That Both Plaintiff Who Prevailed On<br />Contract Claim And Defendant Were Entitled To Fees "," Tierra Holdings, Ltd. V. Mercantile Bank "," Attorney Fees, Proposal for Settlement "]
page[379]=["clu-060111.html"," Fourth DCA Finds Entitlement To Fees Under Terms Of Contract<br />Where Complaint Was Dismissed Without Prejudice "," Nudel v. Flagstar Bank "," Attorney's Fees - Attorney Fee "]
page[380]=["clu-060211.html"," Third DCA Reverses Fee Judgment Awarding Hourly Rate In Excess<br />Of Amount Specified In Contingent Fee Contract "," Western &amp; Southern Life Insurnace Company v. Beebe "," Attorney's Fees - Attorney Fees "]
page[381]=["clu-061711.html"," Second District Grants Certiorari And Quashes Order That Compelled<br />Production Of IME Physician Examination Reports Without<br />Compliance With Statutory Notice Requirements "," USAA Casualty Insurance Company v. Callery ","Discovery, Insurance"]
page[382]=["clu-062011.html"," Fifth DCA Finds That Negligent Entrustment Claims Had Potential To Increase<br />Defendant's Liability Because Of Liability Cap Established In S. 324.021,<br />And Thus Claims Should Have Been Allowed To Proceed "," Trevino v. Mobley "," Wrongful Death, Negligence "]
page[383]=["clu-062111.html"," Ninth Circuit Holds That Insurer's Decision To Exhaust Benefits In Payment Of<br />Insured's Wage Loss Claim Rather Than Pay Earlier Received Claim From<br />Medical Provider Was Not Bad Faith "," Regional MRI of Orlando, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company ","PIP,Bad Faith"]
page[384]=["clu-062211.html"," Second DCA Aligns Itself With Fourth And Concludes That Insurer May Not Limit<br />UM Coverage By Defining ''Covered Autos'' More Narrowly In A<br />UM Context Than For Liability Coverages "," Sommerville v. Allstate Insurance Company "," Insurance Coverage, Uninsured Motorist "]
page[385]=["clu-062911.html"," Fifth DCA Holds That Insurer's Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice Of Its Lawsuit<br />Against Insured Was Not A Sufficient Basis To Support Trial Court's Award Of<br /> Fees And Costs To The Insured Under &#167; 627.428, Fla. Stat., Because Dismissal<br />Was Not A ''Judgment Or Decree'' Or The Functional Equivalent Thereof "," Guarantee Insurance Company v. Worker's Temporary Staffing Inc. "," Attorney Fees, Insurance "]
page[386]=["clu-070111.html"," Second DCA Rules That Comprehensive Liability Exclusion For Injuries To Children Of<br />Employees Of Named Insured Is Ambiguous "," North Pointe Casualty Insurance Company v. M &amp; S Tractor Services Inc. "," Insurance, Liability, Exclusions "]
page[387]=["clu-070611.html"," Fourth DCA Holds That Boyfriend's Prank Inducing Girlfriend To<br />Jump Off Cliff Into Water Created Foreseeable Zone Of Risk<br />For Which He Could Be Held Liable "," Borrack v. Reed "," General Tort Law - Torts "]
page[388]=["clu-070711.html"," Second DCA Rules That OPPS CAP Does Not Apply<br />To MRI Fees Under 2008 PIP Statute "," Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. AFO Imaging, Inc. "," PIP - Personal Injury Protection "]
page[389]=["clu-071211.html"," Second DCA Reverses Order Compelling Appraisal Of<br />Homeowner's Hurricane Claim Where Trial Court Failed To<br />Conduct Evidentiary Hearing On Factual Over<br />Post-Loss Obligations "," Citizens Property Insurance Corporation v. Admiralty House, Inc. "," Insurance - Appraisal "]
page[390]=["clu-072011.html"," Fifth DCA Holds That A Party Cannot Recover Fees Pursuant To<br />An Offer Of Judgment Under 768.79, When The Offer Is<br />Generally Applicable Or Directed To Both Monetary<br />And Non-Monetary/Injunctive Claims "," Winter Park Imports, Inc. v. JM Family Enterprises "," Attorney's Fees - Proposal For Settlement - Attorney Fee "]
page[391]=["clu-072111.html"," First DCA Sustains Summary Judgment In Favor Of Property Owner And<br />Against Employee Of Independent Contractor Who Fell Through<br />Skylights For Which He Was Hired To Work "," Torts - Negligence - Premises Liability "," Strickland v. Timco Aviation Services, Inc. "]
page[392]=["clu-072211.html"," Fourth DCA Holds That Common-Law Collateral Source Evidentiary Rule Did Not<br />Require Trial Court To Limit Plaintiff's Proof Of Past Medical Damages To<br />The Reduced Amount That Plaintiff's Health Care Providers Had<br />Actually Accepted As Payment In Full, Where Plaintiff Had<br />''Earned'' Discount By Successfully Negotiating It, And Was Thus<br />Entitled To Present Total Medical Bills, Un-Discounted, At Trial "," Durse v. Henn "," Torts, Trial, Damages, Collateral Source Rule "]
page[393]=["clu-072511.html"," Second DCA Reaffirms That Allowing Discovery Of Private Health Information<br />In Past CME Reports Is A Departure From The Essential Elements Of The Law,<br />Even If The Reports Are Not Produced&#8212; Opens Door To Motions To Strike<br />CME Physicians Who Do Not Produce List Of Prior Examinees "," Crowley v. Lamming "," Torts - Trial - Discovery "]
page[394]=["clu-072711.html"," Fourth DCA  Creates Conflict And Holds That Trial Court Did Not Abuse Its<br />Discretion By Granting Plaintiff's Motion For New Trial On The Ground That<br />The Jury's Verdict Was Against Manifest Weight Of The Evidence,<br />Even Though There Was Competent Evidence To Support The Verdict "," Kuebler v. Ferris "," Trial, Post-Trial, Motions For New Trial "]
page[395]=["clu-072911.html"," Court Finds The Plain Language Of A Policy Would Be Meaningless Without<br />A Discernable,Geographic Limitation To Coverage And Thus<br />A Golf Cart Accident On A Private Road In A Residential<br />Community Did Not Occur On An ''Insured Premises.'' "," Homeowners Insurance, Policy Interpretation "," Elliott v. State Farm Insurance Company  - Elliot"]
page[396]=["clu-080211.html"," Fourth DCA Addresses Venue Issues In Case In Which Parties And Witnesses<br />Resided In Various Counties&#8212; Concludes That Convenience Of<br />The Witnesses And Interests Of Justice Were Most Important Factors "," Wrongful Death "," Pep Boys et al v. Bievenida "]
page[397]=["clu-080311.html"," Third DCA Grants Assignee's Petition For Writ Of Certiorari Holding That The<br />Circuit Court Appellate Division Departed From The Essential Requirements<br />Of Law In Failing To Award Appellate Attorney's Fees To Comprehensive<br />For Prevailing On The Expert Witness Fee Issue "," Personal Injury Protection, Attorney Fee "," Comprehensive Health Center, LLC, a/a/o Huldah Lynch v. United Automobile Insurance Company "]
page[398]=["clu-080511.html"," Second DCA Finds That Damages Awardable To UM Carrier For Subrogation Against At-Fault,<br />Uninsured Driver Must Be Established By Competent Evidence And Cannot Be<br />Proven Simply By Establishing What UM Carrier Paid In Damages "," Civil Procedure, Summary Judgment, Damages "," Waring v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. "]
page[399]=["clu-081111.html"," Third DCA Rules That Letter From Non-Attorney Corporate Representative Was<br />Sufficient To Require Notice Before Default And Judgment Were Entered "," United Insurance Group, Inc. v. Figueredo "," Default, Civil Procedure "]
page[400]=["clu-081211.html"," Fourth DCA Reverses Judgment On Grounds That Trial Court Should Have Granted<br />Directed Verdict On Seatbelt Defense Where Expert Could Not State With<br />Certainty That Seatbelt Would Have Prevented Injuries<br />Sustained In Rollover Accident "," Henry v. Hoelke "," Torts, Automobile Accident, Evidence, Seatbelt Defense "]
page[401]=["clu-081511.html"," Fourth DCA Concludes That Surgeon Who Provided Controversial ''Surgery''<br />To Plaintiff Pursuant To A Letter Of Protection And On Referral From The<br />Lawyer Is A 'Hybrid Witness' Subject To Discovery Regarding The Financial<br />Benefits He Received From Performing Litigation Related Surgeries "," Katzman MD v. Rediron Fabrication, Inc. "," Discovery, Experts "]
page[402]=["clu-081911.html"," Fourth DCA Reverses Summary Judgment And Finds No Coverage For Claim<br />Excluded By The ''Damage To Property'' Exclusion In CGL Policy "," Wilshire Ins. Co. v. Birch Crest Apartments, Inc. "," Insurance Coverage, Policy Exclusions, CGL Policy "]
page[403]=["clu-082211.html"," Eleventh Circuit Court Of Appeals Finds That UM Anti-Stacking Provision Of Policy<br />Issued In Maryland To Maryland Resident Who Subsequently Moved To Florida,<br />But Failed To Give Notice Of Relocation To Insurer Was<br />Enforceable To Preclude Stacking "," State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Duckworth "," Insurance, Choice Of Law, Uninsured Motorist Coverage "]
page[404]=["clu-082911.html","Florida Supreme Court Finds That Household Exclusion Is Unambiguous And Applies To<br />Preclude Coverage Of Claimant Who Is Member Of Household Of Permissive<br />User Of Vehicle, Rather Than Named Insured "," State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Menendez "," Insurance Coverage, Policy Exclusion, Automobile Policy "]
page[405]=["clu-083011.html"," Fifth DCA Reverses Summary Judgment Based On Workers' Compensation Immunity&#8212;<br />Finds That Injury While Moving Concrete Barrier Walls At Construction Site<br />Fell Outside The Definition Of ''Working In The Construction Industry''<br />And Thus Employee Was Not Statutory Employee "," Homer Lovering v. Leslie C. Nickerson and the Middlesex Corporation "," Torts, Workers Comp - Workers' Comp - Worker's Comp"]
page[406]=["clu-090611.html"," Southern District Of Florida Dismisses Portion Of Condominium Association's<br />Hurricane Claim As Time Barred; Under SB 408 Property Insurance Claims<br />Have A Five-Year Statute Of Limitations Which Runs From The<br />Date Of Loss And Not Date Of Breach ",""," View West Condominium Association Inc. v. Aspen Specialty Insurance Company "]
page[407]=["clu-091211.html"," Fourth DCA Upholds Proposal For Settlement Which Had Limited Description Of<br />Proposed Release That Was A Condition Of Proposal, Finding That<br />Under Facts Of Case Condition Was Sufficiently Clear "," Jones v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc. "," Attorney Fees "]
page[408]=["clu-091511.html"," Fifth DCA Rules That Exceptions To Owner Liability Under Dangerous Instrumentality<br />Doctrine Is Not Limited To Situations In Which Title Transfer Has Not Yet<br />Been Completed Or Where Title Is Held Only For Security Purpose&#8212;<br />Concludes That Other Scenarios May Exist Under Which A<br />Person On The Title Is Not Held Liable And That<br />The Question May Be One For The Jury "," Bowen  v. Taylor-Christensen  "," Torts, Dangerous Instrumentality Doctrine "]
page[409]=["clu-101111.html"," Fifth DCA Finds No Settlement Occurred When Insurer Attempted<br />To Accept Claimant's Pre-Suit Offer  "," Enforcing Pre-suit Settlement, Contract, Bad Faith "," Knowling v. Manavoglu "]
page[410]=["clu-101311.html"," Third DCA Rejects Claim That Insured Can Recover UM Benefits For Injuries Sustained<br />When Insured Vehicle Was Carjacked And Insured Was Forced To Occupy The Trunk"," UM Coverage "," Allstate Insurance Company v. Adrabi "]
page[411]=["clu-102411.html"," Third DCA Finds There Was Settlement Of Homeowner Claim Where Insrueds Accepted<br />Payment Check From Insurer After Insured's Complaint To Government<br />Insurance Regulators Resolved The Coverage Dispute"," United Property &amp; Casualty Insurance Company v. Valladares "," Insurance, Property Claim, Settlement "]
page[412]=["clu-110311.html"," Fourth DCA Reverses Trial Court's Denial Of Prevailing Party Attorney's Fees<br />On Grounds That Neither Party Prevailed, Concluding That In Breach Of Contract Cases<br />One Party Must Prevail And Party Who Recovered Much Of Its Damages And<br />Completely Defeated Counterclaim Was Prevailing Party "," Animal Wrappers and Doggie Wrappers, Inc. v. Courtyard Distribution Center, Inc. "," Attorneys Fees, Prevailing Party, Landlord Tenant "]
page[413]=["clu-110711.html"," Miami Circuit Court Grants Certiorari To Quash Discovery Order<br />That Compelled Production Of Adjuster Notes In PIP Suit "," State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. South Miami Health Center, Inc.<br />(a/a/o Trinidad Bullen) "," PIP, Discovery, Work Product, Claims File Discovery "]
page[414]=["clu-111011.html"," Employee Engaged In An Unapproved, Personal Trip Determined Not To Be<br />Engaged In Course And Scope Of Business At Time Of Accident "," Torts - Automobile Accident - Vicarious Liability "," Adams and Adams v. Hancock "]
page[415]=["clu-111811.html"," Second DCA Holds That Arbitration Claims Are Not Civil Actions Or Proceedings<br />For Purposes Of Section 95.011, Florida Statutes (2005), And Florida<br />Statutes Of Limitations Are Not Applicable To Arbitration Where The<br />Arbitration Agreement Does Not Expressly Provide For Their Application"," Arbitration, Statute Of Limitations, Contracts - 95.011 "," Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. v. Phillips "]
page[416]=["clu-112311.html"," The Fourth DCA Held That The Trial Court's Determination That Defendants Waived Its<br />Work Product Objections, Due To A Failure To File A Privilege Log With<br />Its Responses To Production, Was Improper "," Civil Procedure, Discovery, Work Product Privilege "," Fifth Third Bank v. ACA Plus, Inc. "]
page[417]=["clu-112811.html"," First DCA Finds Corporate Representative's Testimony In Insurance Bad Faith Action That<br />Issue Was Discussed With Counsel Did Not Waive Attorney Client Privilege<br />In Regard To Defense Decisions In The Underlying Action "," Teachers Ins. Co. v. Loeb "," Bad Faith, Discovery, Attorney-Client Privilege "]
page[418]=["clu-112911.html"," Fourth DCA Denies New Trial Because Trial Court's Exclusion Of Opinions That Plaintiff's<br />Treatment Was Not Reasonable Or Necessary Was Harmless Where Such Evidence<br />Came In Through The Written Reports And Other Evidence "," Aarmada Protection Systems 2000, Inc., v. Yandell "," Torts, Auto Accident, Reasonableness Of Treatment "]
page[419]=["clu-122811.html"," Third DCA Agrees With Fourth DCA's Kingsway Amigo Decision And Finds That Where Policy<br />Does Not Make Specific Election To Apply Statutory Payment Limitations,<br />Insurer Must Make Payment At 80% Of Charge"," GEICO Indemnity Co. v. Virtual Imaging Services, Inc. - Personal Injury Protection "," PIP, Insurance Law "]
page[420]=["clu-122911.html"," Fifth DCA Holds That Failure To Attend Compulsory CME Is A Breach Of Condition Subsequent,<br />Which Is An Affirmative Defense Which Insurer Has Burden To Plead And<br />Prove And That Breach Did Not Forfeit Benefits Without Regard To<br />Prejudice To Insurer - Also Concludes That Insurer Was Not Prejudiced By<br />Breach Even Though It Failed To Obtain CME During 60 Day ''Cure'' Period<br />Allowed Under 624.155 "," Insurance Coverage, Uninsured Motorist Coverage "," State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company v. Curran "]
page[421]=["clu-122911a.html"," Fourth DCA Issues Second Tier Certiorari To Reverse Order Denying<br />Attorney's Fees Insured Who Prevailed On Insurer's Counterclaim For Fraud"," Insurance, Attorney Fees, Prevailing Party "," Rodriguez v. Government Employees Insurance Company "]
page[422]=["clu-011912.html"," Second DCA Dismisses Petition for Writ of Certiorari in Sinkhole Case Pending Neutral Evaluation&#8212;<br />Court Denies Motion to Lift Stay Pending Neutral Evaluation and Confirms 2010<br />Neutral Evaluation Statute is Not Unconstitutional "," Insurance, Sinkhole, Neutral Evaluation "," Cruz v. Cooperativa de Seguros Multiples De Puerto Rico - 627.7074 "]
page[423]=["clu-012412.html"," Florida Supreme Court Determines That FIGA Is Not Obligated To Pay An<br />Attorney Fee Award Under 627.428(1), If The Underlying Policy Does Not<br />Expressly Provide Coverage For A Section 627.428(1) Award "," Petty v. Florid Insurance Guaranty Association"," FIGA, Attorney's Fees, Covered Claim 627.428 "]
page[424]=["clu-020212.html"," Florida Supreme Court Finds That &#167;627.7073(1)(c) Provision That<br />Engineer/Geologist Findings Are Presumed Correct Applies Only In The Claims Process<br />And Does Not Create A Rebuttable Presumption Applicable To Litigation<br />In Order To Shift Burden Of Proof To Insured "," Insurance, Sinkhole, Presumptions "," Universal Insurance Company of North America v. Warfel "]


page[425]=["","","",""]
page[426]=["","","",""]
page[427]=["","","",""]
page[428]=["","","",""]
page[429]=["","","",""]



 

//
//    You can alter the way the Javascript Search Engine works by changing the values below.
//    Change these if you do not like the default behaviour.  Only use true or false.
//

//    Do you want detailed output quoting each occurence of the search word?

var ShowDetailedOutput = true

//    Do you wish to show the number of times the word is quoted?

var ShowQuoteCount = true

//    Do you want the matched pages listed in order of relevance?

var SortResults = true

//    Do you change the sort ordering?  You can do this by altering the following numbers.
//    For example, if you want URL matches above Description matches then change
//    SortOrderDescription = 3 and SortOrderURL = 2

var SortOrderTitle = 1
var SortOrderDescription = 4
var SortOrderContent = 3
var SortOrderURL = 2

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//
//    Do not alter any script code below this line.
//
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

var jsse01 = 0;var jsse02 = 1;var jsse03 = 2;var jsse04 = 3;var jsse05 = 4;var jsse06 = 5;var jsse07 = 6;var jsse08 = 7;var jsse09 = 8;var jsse10 = "";var jsse21;
function InitialFocus(){ document.formSearch.txtSearch.focus();}
function jsse71(jsse11) { if ((jsse11>="a" && jsse11<="z") || (jsse11>="A" && jsse11<="Z") || (jsse11>="0" && jsse11 <="9")) { return true; } else{ return false; } }
function jsse75( jsse14, jsse22, jsse12 ) { var jsse25 = page[jsse14][jsse22].toUpperCase(); var jsse13, jsse23, jsse24; var jsse45 = 0; page[jsse14][jsse06]=0; jsse13=jsse25.indexOf( jsse12 ); while( jsse13 >= 0 )	{ jsse45 = jsse45 + jsse13 + 1;if (jsse13 == 0)	{jsse23=false;}else{jsse23=jsse71(jsse25.charAt(jsse13-1));}if ( jsse25.length - jsse13 == jsse12.length){jsse24 = false;}else{jsse24 = jsse71(jsse25.charAt(jsse13 + jsse12.length));}if (!jsse23 && !jsse24){page[jsse14][jsse09+page[jsse14][jsse06]] = jsse45 - 1;page[jsse14][jsse06] ++;}jsse25 = jsse25.substring(jsse13+1,jsse25.length);while( jsse71(jsse25.charAt(0)) && jsse25.length > 0 ){jsse25 = jsse25.substring( 1, jsse25.length ); jsse45 ++;}jsse13 = jsse25.indexOf(jsse12);}}
function jsse92( jsse14, jsse12 ){ var jsse22=0, jsse44; page[jsse14][jsse05]=-1; do { jsse44 = jsse22==0 ? 1 : (jsse22==1 ? 0 : (jsse22==2 ? 2 : 3)); jsse75( jsse14, jsse44, jsse12 ); if ( page[jsse14][jsse06] > 0 ) { page[jsse14][jsse05] = jsse44; } } while( jsse22++ < jsse04 && page[jsse14][jsse05]==-1 );}
function jsse98(){ var jsse14, jsse22, jsse38, jsse39;var jsse40 = 100000; for( jsse14=1; jsse14<page.length; jsse14++ ) { page[jsse14][jsse08] = jsse14; } if( SortResults ) { for( jsse14=1; jsse14<page.length; jsse14++ ) { if( page[jsse14][jsse05] == jsse02 ) { page[jsse14][jsse07] = (4-SortOrderTitle) * jsse40; } else if( page[jsse14][jsse05] == jsse03 ) { page[jsse14][jsse07] = (4-SortOrderDescription) * jsse40; } else if( page[jsse14][jsse05] == jsse01 ) { page[jsse14][jsse07] = (4-SortOrderURL) * jsse40; } else { page[jsse14][jsse07] = (4-SortOrderContent) * jsse40 + page[jsse14][jsse06]; } } for( jsse14=2; jsse14<page.length; jsse14++ ) { jsse38 = page[jsse14][jsse07]; jsse39 = page[jsse14][jsse08]; for( jsse22=jsse14; jsse22>1 && jsse38 > page[jsse22-1][jsse07]; jsse22--) { page[jsse22][jsse07] = page[jsse22-1][jsse07]; page[jsse22][jsse08] = page[jsse22-1][jsse08]; } page[jsse22][jsse07] = jsse38; page[jsse22][jsse08] = jsse39;}}}
function jsse97( jsse14 ) { var jsse46 = page[jsse14][jsse06]==1 ? "" : "s"; jsse10 += "<BR>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;<SMALL><font color=gray>(" + page[jsse14][jsse06] + " quote" + jsse46 + ")</font></SMALL>";}
function jsse63( jsse14, jsse37 ){ var jsse33; var jsse34;var jsse35=false; var jsse36=page[jsse14][jsse09 + jsse37 - 1]; jsse33 = jsse36<30 ? jsse33=0 : jsse33=jsse36-30; jsse34 = (jsse36+30 > page[jsse14][jsse04].length) ? jsse34=page[jsse14][jsse04].length : jsse34=jsse36+30; while ((jsse33>=0) && !jsse35){ if(jsse71(page[jsse14][jsse04].charAt(jsse33))) { jsse33--; } else { jsse35=true; } } jsse33++; jsse35=false; while ((jsse34 > jsse36) && !jsse35) { if(jsse71(page[jsse14][jsse04].charAt(jsse34))) { jsse34--; } else { jsse35=true; } } jsse10 += "<BR>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;\".. "+page[jsse14][jsse04].substring(jsse33,jsse36); jsse10 += "<B>" + page[jsse14][jsse04].substring(jsse36 , jsse36 + jsse21.length ) +"</B>"; jsse10 += page[jsse14][jsse04].substring(jsse36 + jsse21.length ,jsse34) + " ..\"";}
function jsse64( jsse14 ) { if( ShowDetailedOutput ) { for( var jsse22=1; jsse22<=page[jsse14][jsse06]; jsse22++ ) {jsse63( jsse14, jsse22 );}}else{jsse63( jsse14, 1 );}if( ShowQuoteCount ){jsse97( jsse14 );}}
function jsse61( jsse25, jsse36 ) { jsse10 += jsse25.substring( 0, jsse36 ); jsse10 += "<B>" + jsse25.substring( jsse36 , jsse36 + jsse21.length ) +"</B>"; jsse10 += jsse25.substring( jsse36 + jsse21.length ,jsse25.length ); }
function jsse83( jsse14, jsse31 ) { jsse10 += "<P><h5><B>" + jsse31 +". "; jsse10 += "<A href=\""+page[jsse14][jsse01]+"\">"+page[jsse14][jsse02]+"</A></B><BR>"; jsse10 += "&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;<SMALL>URL&#160;&#160;</SMALL><font color=gray>"; if( page[jsse14][jsse05]==jsse01 ) {jsse61( page[jsse14][jsse01], page[jsse14][jsse09] );}else{jsse10 += page[jsse14][jsse01];}jsse10 += "</font>";if( page[jsse14][jsse05]==jsse03 ){jsse10 += "<BR>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;";jsse61( page[jsse14][jsse03], page[jsse14][jsse09] );}else{if( page[jsse14][jsse03].length > 0 ){jsse10 += "<BR>&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;" + page[jsse14][jsse03];}else{jsse10 += "&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;";}}if ( page[jsse14][jsse05]==jsse04 ){jsse64(jsse14);}else{jsse10+="</h5></P>";}}
function jsse82() { var jsse31 = 0; for( var jsse14=1; jsse14<page.length; jsse14++ ) { if( page[page[jsse14][jsse08]][jsse06] > 0 ) { jsse83(page[jsse14][jsse08], ++jsse31); } }}
function jsse89() { jsse10 += "<HTML><HEAD><script src='scripts/search-test.js' type='text/javascript'></script><TITLE>Search results for \"" + jsse21 + "\"</TITLE></HEAD>"; jsse10 += "<center><img src='images/bg-top.png' height='37' width='100%' alt='' /><img src='images/site-search.jpg'width='900'  height='182' alt=''><font face=arial><font color=navy><h4><br />Search Results For:&#160</font><font color=maroon><em>" + jsse21 +".</em></h4></font>";}
function jsse86() { var jsse32=0;for( var jsse14=1; jsse14<page.length; jsse14++ ){if( page[jsse14][jsse06]>0 ){jsse32 ++;}}if(jsse32==0){jsse10 += "<h3><P>No pages matched your search.&#160;&#160;</h3>";}else{var jsse46 = jsse32==1 ? "" : "s";jsse10 += "<br /><br /><P>" + jsse32 + " page" + jsse46 + " listed.&#160;&#160;";}jsse10 += "<A href=\"javascript:history.go(-1)\"><B>Search Again</B></A></P><br />";jsse10 += "<P><SMALL>Powered by <A HREF=\"http://www.javascript.freeuk.com\">JavaScript Search Engine</A>&#169;1999</SMALL></P><br /><br /><br />";jsse10 += "<center></font></BODY></HTML>";}
function jsse81(){ var jsse47 = jsse10; document.open(); document.write(jsse47); document.close();}
function jsse77( jsse25 ){ var jsse48=""; for( var jsse14=0; jsse14<jsse25.length; jsse14++){if( jsse25.charAt(jsse14)=="<" ){jsse48 += "&lt;";}else if( jsse25.charAt(jsse14)==">" ){jsse48 += "&gt;";}else{jsse48 += jsse25.charAt(jsse14);}}return( jsse48 );}
function ClickSearch(){ var jsse12; jsse21=document.formSearch.txtSearch.value;if ( jsse21.length > 0 ){jsse21 = jsse77(jsse21);jsse12 = jsse21.toUpperCase()	;	for( var jsse14=1; jsse14<page.length; jsse14++ ){jsse92( jsse14, jsse12 );}jsse98();jsse89();jsse82();jsse86();jsse81();}}

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//
//    End of JavaScript Search Engine script
//
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////-->